Lucid Trading vs Tradeify: Which Futures Prop Firm Fits You Best?

Both Lucid Trading and Tradeify sit at the top of the futures prop firm space right now—and I've traded funded accounts on both.

After running LucidFlex for months and cycling through Tradeify's Growth and Select plans, I can tell you these two firms get more right than 90% of what's out there. But they're built for different types of traders, and picking the wrong one costs you time, eval fees, and potentially real payouts. Here's the honest breakdown from someone who's actually used both—not just read their marketing pages.

How I compare firms: This comparison is built from actual accounts I've run with each firm—not from reading marketing pages or aggregating reviews. I've passed evals, traded funded, requested withdrawals, and dealt with support at both firms.

Lucid has been one of my primary prop firms since early 2025. For the full breakdown of their evaluation structure, account types, payout system, and what makes them different from other futures firms, check out my complete Lucid Trading review. It's based on 14 payouts, multiple funded accounts, and 18+ months of real trading—including what works, what doesn't, and where they fall short. For the absolute latest, check Lucid Trading's website or their help center.

The Big Picture: Two Different Philosophies

Here's the thing about Lucid and Tradeify—they're solving the same problem from completely different angles. Lucid Trading launched in early 2025 and immediately went aggressive on removing rules traders hate. No daily loss limit on LucidFlex. No consistency requirement once funded. One-time eval fees instead of monthly subscriptions. The whole approach screams "we trust you to trade, just don't blow up."

Tradeify—founded by Brett Simba—took a different path. They built a tiered system with multiple account types (Advanced, Growth, Select, Lightning Funded) that gives you options depending on how much structure you want. Monthly subscription evals, but also instant-funded routes. More rules in some areas, fewer in others.

I actually like both firms pretty well, and I think they're both top-notch as of February 2026. Neither one has given me a reason to doubt their legitimacy or payout reliability. But the devil's in the details, and those details matter a lot depending on how you trade.

Head-to-Head Comparison: The Full Breakdown

Let me lay this out so you can see everything at once. I'm comparing the most popular evaluation accounts at both firms—LucidFlex at Lucid Trading and Select at Tradeify—because these are the flagship products most traders should be looking at.

Evaluation Experience: Getting Funded

Lucid Trading's Approach

LucidFlex evaluations feel... clean. One-time fee, no time limit, no monthly rebilling breathing down your neck. I appreciate not watching a subscription counter tick while I'm trying to trade patiently. The $130 for a 50K account is genuinely cheap for what you're getting.

The 50% consistency rule during eval means you can technically pass in 2 days—though Lucid recommends taking 3-7 days, and honestly, I agree. Rushing evals is how I blew my first Flex account. The no-daily-loss-limit part is massive during volatile sessions. I've been down $1,100 intraday on an NQ position during CPI and closed the day green because EOD drawdown only cares about your closing balance. Intraday trailing would've killed me by 9:45 AM.

One thing I really like: once you pass, the upgrade to funded is instant. We're talking 5-10 minutes. No waiting period, no activation fee, no "review process." You just... start trading funded.

Tradeify's Approach

Tradeify Select evaluations use monthly subscriptions—$159/month for 50K. That sounds more expensive, and it is if you take multiple months to pass. But Tradeify's 40% consistency rule is actually more lenient than Lucid's 50%, which means you need a minimum of 3 trading days instead of 2. In practice, both take most traders 5-10 days anyway, so the difference is academic.

The Select evaluation also has no daily loss limit—which is a big deal. Growth evaluations do have one (soft breach, trading stops for the day but account survives), so make sure you're picking the right account type. I made this mistake early on and lost a Growth eval because I didn't realize the DLL was active.

The thing Tradeify does that I wish Lucid would copy? After passing, you choose between Select Flex (5-day payout cycles) or Select Daily (smaller, more frequent payouts). That choice is permanent for the account, but having the option at all is a nice touch.

Funded Account Rules: Where It Really Matters

This is where these two firms diverge hard. And honestly? It's the section you should read twice.

LucidFlex funded accounts have zero consistency rules. None. You can make $4,000 on Monday trading GC during an FOMC spike and then $200 the rest of the week—your payout still processes normally. I tested this. It works. For traders with a "home run" style—fewer trades, bigger winners—this is a game changer. No more engineering your profit distribution to satisfy some arbitrary percentage.

Tradeify Select Flex funded accounts carry a 35% consistency rule. No single day can represent more than 35% of your total profits in a payout cycle. That's not terrible—it's way better than the 20% some firms enforce—but it does mean you need to think about how your profits are distributed across days. If you're a steady, consistent trader who makes $300-$600 daily, you'll never feel this rule. If you're the type who swings for the fences twice a week? It'll bite you eventually.

I learned this the hard way on a different firm with a 20% consistency rule. Had a beautiful $2,800 NFP Friday on GC, followed by four decent $150-$250 days. The math put my best day at 52% of profits. Payout denied. On LucidFlex? That same scenario clears without a second thought.

Payout Structure: Getting Your Money Out

Both firms pay fast—I've had same-day payouts on Tradeify and next-day on Lucid. Neither one makes you wait a week wondering if your money's coming. That alone puts them ahead of most of the industry.

But the mechanics are different enough to matter.

Lucid Trading Payouts

LucidFlex requires 10 trading days per payout cycle with 5 profitable days (minimum $150 profit each on 50K accounts). Payout caps start at $1,500 for the first payout and scale progressively—$2,000 for the second, climbing to $4,000+ by your fourth payout. After 6 total payouts, you graduate to LucidLive with real capital.

The no-buffer requirement is huge. You don't need to maintain a $2,000+ cushion above some arbitrary line before you can withdraw. If you've met the trading day requirements and have profits, you request a payout. Done.

One caveat: the $5,000 move-to-live cap per LucidFlex account means you want to be strategic about when you request your 6th payout. Don't leave $8,000 sitting in the account when you graduate—request that last payout first.

Tradeify Payouts

Select Flex requires just 5 winning days (minimum $150 profit each on 50K)—nearly half the wait of Lucid's 10-day cycle. You can withdraw up to 50% of your total profits, capped at $3,000 per payout on 50K accounts. That's actually a bigger first payout than Lucid allows.

The catch? After your first payout, you need to be net positive since your last withdrawal to request another one. Even if your account is up $5,000 total, if you've been flat or slightly down since the last payout, you're locked out until you generate fresh profit. I don't love this rule—it's the one thing about Tradeify's Select Flex that feels unnecessary—but it's manageable if you're actually trading consistently.

After 5 total payouts across any Tradeify accounts, you become eligible for their Elite Live program. Similar concept to Lucid's LucidLive—real capital, real money, daily payouts.

Platforms and Instant-Funded Options

Lucid gives you Rithmic, Tradovate, and NinjaTrader. If you're an order-flow trader using Bookmap or Jigsaw, Rithmic integration is critical—and Lucid has it. Tradeify runs exclusively on Tradovate, with NinjaTrader and TradingView accessible through Tradovate credentials. No Rithmic. If your workflow depends on Rithmic data, that settles the debate immediately.

Both firms offer instant-funded paths: LucidDirect ($497 for 50K) and Tradeify Lightning Funded ($349 for 50K). Both skip evaluations, both come with stricter rules than their eval counterparts—daily loss limits and tighter consistency requirements. Tradeify's $148 cheaper here. But honestly? I think evaluations are the better path at both firms.

Who Should Choose Lucid Trading?

Pick Lucid if you're the type of trader who:

Has volatile winning days and doesn't want consistency rules punishing your best sessions. The zero-consistency-once-funded policy on LucidFlex is genuinely unique and worth it for traders with concentrated profit distributions.

Prefers one-time eval fees. If you're the trader who takes 3-6 weeks to pass evaluations, Lucid's flat pricing means no monthly drain while you're working through it. I've seen traders spend $477 on three months of Tradeify subscriptions for a 50K account they could've had for $130 at Lucid.

Needs Rithmic. Full stop. If your strategy depends on Rithmic data feeds, Bookmap, or Sierra Chart through Rithmic—Lucid is your only option between these two.

Trades news aggressively. Lucid has zero news trading restrictions on any account type. No blackout windows, no "manage risk properly" disclaimers. NFP, FOMC, CPI—trade them all, anytime.

Who Should Choose Tradeify?

Go with Tradeify if you're someone who:

Wants faster payout cycles. Five winning days versus ten trading days means you're getting cash out roughly twice as fast on Tradeify Select Flex. For traders who are consistently profitable daily, that velocity matters.

Values bigger early payouts. Tradeify's $3,000 first payout cap (50% of profits) on 50K Select Flex beats Lucid's $1,500 cap. If you build profits quickly and want to extract more cash sooner, Tradeify wins here.

Prefers TradingView integration. If TradingView is your charting platform and you don't want to switch, Tradeify makes it seamless through Tradovate.

Wants the cheapest instant-funded option. Lightning Funded at $349 is cheaper than LucidDirect at $497 for the same 50K account size.

Already trades steadily. If your daily P&L rarely has one massive day above 35% of your weekly total, Tradeify's consistency rule won't affect you at all—and the faster payout cycles become the deciding factor.

My Take: Running Both

Look, I'm going to be straight with you—I run accounts on both firms simultaneously. Not because I can't decide, but because they serve different purposes in my setup. LucidFlex accounts are where I trade aggressively around news events and high-volatility sessions where I might have one massive day followed by smaller ones. Tradeify Select Flex accounts are where I run my bread-and-butter daily setups—steady, consistent, $300-$600 days on ES and NQ—and extract profits faster.

If I had to pick only one? For most traders reading this, I'd lean Lucid Trading. The one-time eval fee, zero funded consistency rule, and Rithmic support make it the more flexible choice overall. But Tradeify is right there—and for consistent daily traders who want faster cash flow, it might actually be the better fit.

Both firms are legit. Both pay fast. Both have clean rules that don't feel like hidden traps. You really can't go wrong with either one. The question isn't "which is better"—it's "which fits how you actually trade."

Frequently asked questions about Lucid Trading vs Tradeify

What is the main difference between Lucid Trading and Tradeify?

Lucid Trading offers three account types (LucidFlex, LucidBlack, LucidDirect) with a real-capital graduation path via LucidLive. Tradeify offers a simpler one-type funded model with no real-capital tier. Lucid's LucidFlex has zero daily loss limit and zero funded consistency rule — Tradeify uses a trailing drawdown structure with a consistency rule. Both are US-based futures prop firms with fast payout processing.

Does Tradeify have a daily loss limit?

Tradeify uses a trailing drawdown limit rather than a traditional daily loss limit. The trailing drawdown follows your intraday equity peak — similar to Apex's structure — which can close your account during intraday moves even if you recover by close. Lucid Trading's LucidFlex and LucidBlack use EOD drawdown only, measuring your closing balance rather than intraday equity peaks.

Which firm is cheaper — Lucid or Tradeify?

Both are competitively priced with frequent promotional discounts. At regular pricing, Lucid's LucidFlex 50K at $130 and Tradeify's comparable accounts are in a similar range. Both firms run regular sale events that bring prices to $80–$120 for standard accounts. Tradeify's fee structure includes a monthly subscription on some accounts, whereas LucidFlex is a one-time fee with no subscription.

Does Tradeify have a consistency rule?

Yes. Tradeify uses a consistency rule on funded accounts similar to other major prop firms. Lucid Trading's LucidFlex removes the funded consistency rule entirely — your daily profit distribution does not matter. LucidBlack has a 40% funded consistency rule. For traders with high day-to-day variance, LucidFlex's zero consistency structure is significantly more flexible than Tradeify's.

Which firm pays out faster — Lucid or Tradeify?

LucidBlack offers the fastest payout frequency at 3 days between requests. LucidFlex requires 5 profitable days per cycle. Tradeify processes payouts on a request basis with standard processing timelines. Both firms use standard wire or ACH payment methods. In my experience with LucidFlex, payouts arrive within 1–3 hours via Plaid ACH — Tradeify's processing speed is comparable for US traders.

Does Tradeify offer a real-capital funded tier like LucidLive?

No. Tradeify does not have a real-capital trading path equivalent to Lucid's LucidLive tier. All funded Tradeify accounts remain on simulated capital. LucidLive — where traders graduate after 4–6 payout cycles and trade actual CME futures — is a meaningful structural differentiator for traders who want a genuine path to real-money trading within a prop firm framework.

Which platforms does Tradeify support vs Lucid?

Tradeify supports Rithmic-based platforms including NinjaTrader and other Rithmic-compatible tools. Lucid Trading supports Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Rithmic (on LucidBlack and LucidDirect), and TradingView. If you need Tradovate or the Tradovate TradingView integration, Lucid is your only option between the two. If you're exclusively a Rithmic-NinjaTrader trader, both firms cover that setup.

Can I run Lucid and Tradeify accounts simultaneously?

Yes. There is no rule against holding funded accounts at multiple prop firms at the same time. Many active traders run Lucid and Tradeify accounts simultaneously to diversify payout income and maintain active funded accounts across different rule structures. The main constraint is trading time — managing two firm's rules, platforms, and dashboards simultaneously adds cognitive load.

Which firm is better for news traders?

Lucid Trading. All Lucid account types permit trading during major news events with no blackout windows. Tradeify's news trading policy should be confirmed directly before trading during events like NFP or FOMC — some firms in this tier have restrictions. Lucid's explicit allowance of news trading is a genuine differentiator for traders who target high-volatility announcement windows.

Should I choose Lucid Trading or Tradeify?

Choose Lucid if you want zero funded consistency (LucidFlex), a path to real-capital trading (LucidLive), or if you trade with Tradovate. Choose Tradeify if you prefer Rithmic-native platform tools and a simpler one-account-type model. Both are solid firms. I use Lucid as my primary funded platform given the no-DLL structure and LucidLive path — Tradeify is a reasonable secondary option for traders who want rule diversification.

‍