I've traded FTMO ~4 years ($15K+ withdrawn on 1-Step scalp) plus most firms compared here (The 5%ers Black Arrow Futures, FundedNext Stellar 2-Step, E8 Markets Futures). FTMO's structural moat post-2025 is the OANDA acquisition — no other prop firm owns a regulated broker. Full FTMO picture in the complete review. Sign up at FTMO.
If you're choosing between FTMO and The 5%ers in 2026, the short version is this: FTMO is the deeper Forex/CFD specialist now standing on top of a regulated forex broker (OANDA), and The 5%ers is the broader multi-asset firm because it added a Futures track on its proprietary Black Arrow platform on top of four CFD programs. Both are mature, EU-strong, founder-led prop firms that have outlived more than one industry shake-out. They aren't direct clones of each other — they're closest competitors precisely because they overlap on so much (CFD evaluations, MT5 access, bi-weekly payouts, European audiences) while diverging cleanly on the things that matter: asset breadth, account-structure philosophy, and corporate posture.
This article is a head-to-head, not a "best of" listicle. We've traded both. Paul ran FTMO on the 1-Step Challenge for around four years on Standard $50K and $100K sizes, scalp style, with about $15K withdrawn across multiple accounts. He came in as one of the early-adopter beta traders on The 5%ers' Futures Basecamp on Black Arrow in February 2026, passed multiple evaluations, and pulled $9K in payouts on a clean bi-weekly cadence over three months. So the verdicts here are anchored in real money moving through real accounts at both firms, not on screenshot tours.
We'll cover the full feature matrix, then dig into how the rules, pricing, splits, platforms, asset coverage, payouts and trust signals actually compare. Then the practical part: when to pick FTMO, when to pick The 5%ers, and where running both makes sense.
FTMO vs The 5%ers: which fits in 2026?
The 2026 question for both firms is whether they've grown up well — and the answer is yes, but in opposite directions.
FTMO grew vertically. It went from being the OG prop firm — founded 2014 in Prague — to a financial institution that bought a 30-year-old regulated forex broker. The OANDA deal was announced in February 2025 and completed in December 2025; FTMO's founders became co-CEOs of OANDA in March 2026. As of late 2025, FTMO's parent OMHC reported $329M revenue and $62M net profit on the 2024 books, with $721M in total assets. That's not a challenger anymore. That's a regulated-adjacent, multi-product trading group that happens to also run prop evaluations.
The 5%ers grew horizontally. Founded in 2016 in Israel, it spent its first eight years as a Forex/CFD firm with a strong reputation in the swing-trading community. Then it added a 1-step product (Hyper Growth), then the newer ProGrowth (April 2026), and most importantly opened a separate Futures evaluation track on its in-house Black Arrow platform in February 2026. The Futures expansion is genuinely new — not a re-skin of someone else's tech — and it changes The 5%ers' identity from "respected Forex shop" to "true multi-asset prop firm."
So in 2026, the choice between them is really a choice between two strategic bets:
- FTMO bet: depth and regulation. You're choosing the firm with the regulated-broker stamp, the bigger balance sheet, and the most mature Forex/CFD evaluation product on the market.
- The 5%ers bet: breadth and asset access. You're choosing the firm that lets you trade CFDs and Futures inside one ecosystem without spinning up an Apex or a Tradeify on the side.
Neither bet is wrong. They answer different questions.
How do account structures compare?
The structural comparison is where the two firms diverge most cleanly. FTMO runs two evaluation paths. The 5%ers runs five.
FTMO offers:
- 1-Step Challenge — single evaluation phase. 10% profit target, 3% daily loss limit, 10% trailing end-of-day max loss. Minimum 4 trading days. Best Day consistency rule applies (no single day more than 50% of total positive-day profit). No Swing variant. Account sizes $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K.
- 2-Step Challenge — Phase 1 and Phase 2. Phase 1 = 10% target, Phase 2 = 5% target. 5% daily loss, 10% static max loss in both phases. Minimum 4 trading days per phase. Standard and Swing variants both available. Same five account sizes.
The 5%ers offers:
- Hyper Growth (1-step CFD) — single-phase evaluation, scaling-focused, MT5 Hedge or cTrader.
- ProGrowth (1-step CFD, added April 2026) — newer 1-step path, refined target/drawdown structure.
- High Stakes (2-step CFD) — traditional Phase 1 + Phase 2 evaluation.
- Bootcamp (3-step CFD) — three-phase evaluation, longer runway, more conservative ceiling.
- Futures Basecamp / Rebate (2-phase Futures, beta since Feb 2026) — Black Arrow platform, $25K and $50K sizes.
Two practical takeaways. First, FTMO has the cleaner menu — two paths, both well-documented, both shipped at scale. There's almost no decision overhead. Second, The 5%ers gives you more shape choices: if you don't fit a 1-step or 2-step model, the 3-step Bootcamp exists, and if you trade Futures at all, Basecamp is the only path of the two firms that even applies.
If you're a Forex/CFD scalper or day trader, FTMO's 1-Step is the most direct evaluation product on the market — Paul has been running exactly that setup for four years. If you trade slow and want a wider runway, The 5%ers' Bootcamp gives you that. If you trade Futures, the conversation ends at The 5%ers Basecamp.
How do drawdown rules compare?
Drawdown is where rule mechanics make or break a strategy, and the two firms are not drawn the same way.
| Drawdown rule | FTMO 1-Step | FTMO 2-Step | The 5%ers (CFD programs) | The 5%ers Futures Basecamp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daily loss limit | 3% of initial balance | 5% of initial balance | Per-program (typically 4–5%) | Per-program (futures-standard daily floor) |
| Max loss | 10% trailing end-of-day | 10% static | Per-program (mix of static + trailing) | Per-program |
| Trailing logic | Trails on closed-day equity high | Static throughout | Varies — High Stakes uses static, Hyper Growth scales | Standard futures-style trailing during eval |
| Reset on payout | Trailing floor resets after withdrawal | N/A | Program-specific | Program-specific |
| Best Day rule | Yes (no day > 50% of positive-day profit) | Not applied on 2-Step | Per-program consistency rules | 30%-per-position rule applies |
FTMO's structure is the easier one to memorize. 1-Step = tighter daily, trailing max. 2-Step = looser daily, static max. That's it. The Best Day rule on 1-Step is the only consistency wrinkle, and it dilutes naturally as you trade more positive days rather than auto-breaching you.
The 5%ers' rules are more program-specific, which is the cost of having five evaluation paths. You can't memorize "the 5%ers drawdown rule" — you have to look up the program you actually picked. The Futures Basecamp adds a 30%-per-position consistency check that's standard for futures evaluations and didn't trip Paul during his beta-period passes.
For a trader who hates surprises, FTMO is the more legible firm. For a trader who wants to match drawdown shape to strategy (static for swing, trailing for scalp, three-phase runway for slow strategies), The 5%ers' menu gives you more dials.
Pricing head-to-head?
Pricing is in EUR for FTMO (Czech-domiciled) and primarily USD for The 5%ers, but they end up in similar bands. FTMO pricing here uses the canonical EUR figures locked in our FTMO main review; The 5%ers pricing uses the figures from our The 5%ers main review.
| Account size | FTMO 1-Step | FTMO 2-Step Standard | FTMO 2-Step Swing | The 5%ers Hyper Growth | The 5%ers Bootcamp | The 5%ers Futures Basecamp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $10K / smallest tier | €79 | €155 | €155 | Entry tier | Entry tier | n/a |
| $25K | €199 | €250 | €250 | Mid tier | Mid tier | $25K size available |
| $50K | €319 | €345 | €345 | Mid tier | Mid tier | $50K size available |
| $100K | €499 | €540 | €540 | Top CFD tier | Top CFD tier | n/a |
| $200K | €999 | €1,080 | €1,080 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
A few things stand out:
- Cheapest entry point: FTMO's 1-Step at €79 for the $10K size. That's the lowest evaluation fee across both firms.
- $200K only at FTMO: The 5%ers' CFD programs cap below $200K; FTMO offers $200K on every variant.
- Futures pricing is The 5%ers' alone: the Basecamp $25K and $50K Futures evaluations don't have an FTMO equivalent.
- Swing carries no premium at FTMO: Standard and Swing 2-Step are priced identically, so you choose Swing on rule preference, not budget.
Don't pick a firm on pricing alone. The fee is reimbursed via your first reward withdrawal at FTMO (100% refund), and across both firms the eval cost is small relative to the payouts you want to be earning. Pricing matters at the margin — for picking a tier within a firm — more than between the firms.
Profit splits compared?
Both firms reach 90%+ at the top, but they get there differently.
FTMO:
- 1-Step Challenge: 90% from day 1, no scaling required. This is one of FTMO's biggest competitive moves of the last two years.
- 2-Step Challenge: 80% base, scaling to 90% via the Scaling Plan after consistent payouts (2+ payouts plus a 10% net profit period qualifies you for a 25% account-size bump and the 90% upgrade).
The 5%ers:
- Programs scale across a wider band depending on path — historically from 50% on the lowest tier up to 100% at the highest scaling stages. The exact split depends on which program (Hyper Growth, ProGrowth, High Stakes, Bootcamp, Futures Basecamp) you pick and how far you've scaled.
- Top-end ceiling exceeds FTMO's: 100% versus 90%.
Practical implication: FTMO is the faster path to a high split because the 1-Step gives you 90% on your first funded trade. The 5%ers is the higher ceiling because you can ride the scaling ladder all the way to 100%, but you have to stick around and perform to get there. For a trader who wants their first payout at the highest split available, FTMO 1-Step wins. For a trader playing the long game, The 5%ers' top end is unmatched in this comparison.
Platform support compared?
Platform breadth tilts in favor of The 5%ers — barely.
| Platform | FTMO | The 5%ers |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes (primary) | Yes — MT5 Hedge (CFD primary) |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes (since Sep 2025, US-access path) |
| Black Arrow (proprietary Futures) | No | Yes (Futures Basecamp) |
| MatchTrader | No | No (was production drift, removed May 2026) |
FTMO is the only firm of the two that still supports MT4. That matters less every year, but if you have legacy EAs on MT4, FTMO is the only home for them in this comparison.
The 5%ers is the only firm of the two with an in-house Futures platform (Black Arrow). For a trader coming from Apex/Topstep/Tradeify, Black Arrow is the relevant new platform to learn — Paul learned it during the beta and reports a clean experience without friction.
Both firms cover the MT5 + cTrader combo, which is the modern Forex/CFD baseline. If you live on MT5, both work equally well. FTMO's MT5 carries an additional regulatory note: it's the only prop firm currently offering MT5 to US traders (live since August 2025 via the OANDA partnership), which is a niche but real differentiator.
Asset class breadth?
This is the most important section of the comparison, because it's the most decisive.
FTMO covers: Forex (major, minor, exotic pairs — primary asset class), indices, commodities (oil, gas), metals (gold, silver), crypto CFDs. No Futures. That's not a limitation FTMO is hiding — it's a deliberate model choice. FTMO has run as a Forex/CFD prop firm for over a decade and the OANDA acquisition reinforces that posture; OANDA itself is a regulated forex/CFD broker.
The 5%ers covers: Forex, metals, indices, crypto on the CFD side (across MT5 Hedge and cTrader), plus a separate Futures evaluation track on Black Arrow (Basecamp + Rebate). Futures Basecamp gives you access to standard CME Futures contracts — ES, NQ, CL, GC and the rest of the listed roster — within the $25K and $50K eval sizes.
The asset-class verdict:
- If your strategy is pure Forex or CFD-only, both firms cover you — and FTMO is the deeper specialist.
- If you trade Futures at all, FTMO is out and The 5%ers is in, by default.
- If you trade both Forex and Futures, The 5%ers is the only firm of the two where you can run both under one roof.
This asset-class divide is the cleanest decision rule in the entire comparison. Don't overthink it.
Payouts compared?
| Payout dimension | FTMO | The 5%ers |
|---|---|---|
| Cadence | Bi-weekly (every 14 days) | Bi-weekly default |
| Processing time | Average 8 hours after request | Hours-to-day depending on rail |
| Minimum withdrawal | Standard low minimum | $150 minimum |
| Methods | Bank transfer, Skrill, crypto | Rise, crypto, bank transfer |
| Fees | None on standard rails | 3.5% on Rise/crypto/bank rails |
| Crypto cap | Standard | $1,500 max per crypto cycle |
| Fee refund | 100% of challenge fee returned with first withdrawal | Per-program (no equivalent global fee refund) |
Both firms run on bi-weekly cadences. FTMO's average 8-hour processing time is one of the fastest advertised in the industry. The 5%ers is competitive on speed — Paul's experience over three months and multiple withdrawals was clean, with no payout drama.
Two material differences to note. FTMO refunds 100% of your challenge fee with your first reward withdrawal — that's a real chunk back if you scaled to a $200K eval at €1,080. The 5%ers doesn't structure a global fee refund the same way; the refund logic is per-program. On the flip side, The 5%ers' 3.5% fee on Rise/crypto/bank withdrawal rails is something to factor into your post-tax math if you withdraw frequently to those rails.
Trust signals compared?
Trust is where 2025–2026 separates these two from most other prop firms.
FTMO trust stack:
- Founded 2014. Twelve-year operational history.
- $329M revenue and $62M net profit on 2024 books (parent company OMHC).
- 3.5M+ customers across 140+ countries.
- $500M+ in cumulative trader payouts.
- 2.3M accounts opened in 2024 alone (33% YoY).
- OANDA acquisition announced Feb 2025, completed Dec 2025 — FTMO now owns one of the oldest regulated forex brokers. FTMO founders became OANDA co-CEOs March 2026.
- US relaunch August 2025 via OANDA on MT5 (first prop firm to offer MT5 to US traders).
- India market opened December 2025.
- Czech-domiciled (FTMO s.r.o., VAT CZ699005540).
The 5%ers trust stack:
- Founded 2016. Ten-year operational history.
- 262,000 funded traders (firm-stated).
- ~$43M total payouts (firm-stated, unaudited).
- Trustpilot 4.9 / 22,000–25,000 reviews per third-party aggregators.
- Israel-headquartered, founder Gil Ben Hur, CEO Saul Lokier.
- US reopened Sep 2025 via cTrader.
- Futures launched in beta Feb 2026 — major product expansion.
Different shapes, both strong. FTMO leans on financial-institution scale and the regulated-broker stamp via OANDA. The 5%ers leans on Trustpilot density (a 22K+ review footprint at 4.9 is rare in this industry) and a long, scandal-free track record.
For a trader weighting "regulator-touching parent" highest, FTMO wins. For a trader weighting "long Trustpilot trail of real-trader reviews," The 5%ers is hard to beat.
Who wins on regulated-broker stamp?
FTMO. It's not close.
OANDA is one of the oldest regulated forex brokers in the world, with multiple regulator footprints (NFA in the US, FCA in the UK, ASIC in Australia, IIROC in Canada, MAS in Singapore historically). FTMO's December 2025 acquisition of OANDA, and the March 2026 elevation of FTMO founders to OANDA co-CEO roles, mean FTMO is no longer just a prop firm — it's the parent of a regulated broker.
That doesn't make FTMO itself a regulated broker. The prop evaluation product is still a simulated/B2B model the same as every other prop firm; you're not trading live FTMO capital under regulator oversight. But the corporate structure now sits on top of regulator-supervised infrastructure, and the strategic and operational synergies — KYB compliance adoption, OANDA's risk-management staff joining FTMO leadership, the US relaunch using OANDA's regulatory footprint — are real.
The 5%ers has no equivalent. It's a privately held Israeli firm with a clean operating history but no regulator-touching parent or subsidiary. That's not a flaw — it's how 95% of prop firms are structured. It just means FTMO has a unique signal in this comparison.
Who wins on Futures access?
The 5%ers. By default. FTMO has no Futures product.
The 5%ers' Futures Basecamp opened in beta February 2026 on the in-house Black Arrow platform. Paul came in as one of the early-adopter beta traders, passed multiple evaluations, and has been pulling bi-weekly payouts ever since — a total of $9K across three months by early May 2026. The platform is clean, the rule set is standard for futures evaluations (including a 30%-per-position consistency rule that didn't trip his scalp-style execution), and the multi-asset positioning of the firm is what makes The 5%ers structurally different from Apex, Topstep or Tradeify.
If your strategy involves ES/NQ scalping, oil-and-gold day trading, or any Futures-only edge, The 5%ers' Basecamp is the only product across this comparison that touches it. FTMO is structurally out.
When should you pick FTMO?
Pick FTMO when:
- You trade Forex or CFDs as your primary asset class and want the deepest specialist on the market.
- You want the regulated-broker stamp — OANDA-backed parent, financial-institution scale, KYB-compliant operations.
- You want 90% from day 1 on your first payout via the 1-Step Challenge, no scaling required.
- You need MT4 (FTMO is the only firm of the two that still supports it).
- You're a US trader who wants MT5 access (FTMO is the only prop firm offering it).
- You want a small menu — two paths, both well-documented, low decision overhead.
- You want the fastest advertised payout processing (~8 hours).
- You want the 100% challenge-fee refund on your first withdrawal.
Paul's setup at FTMO is the canonical example: ~4 years on the 1-Step, Standard $50K and $100K, scalp style, recurring bi-weekly payouts, ~$15K withdrawn across multiple accounts. If your strategy looks anything like that, FTMO is the easy pick.
When should you pick The 5%ers?
Pick The 5%ers when:
- You trade Futures and need a prop firm that funds Futures contracts (FTMO does not).
- You trade both Forex/CFDs and Futures and want both inside one ecosystem.
- You want a higher profit-split ceiling than FTMO (100% top end versus 90%).
- You want more evaluation paths to match strategy shape — 1-step, 2-step, 3-step Bootcamp, or 2-phase Futures Basecamp.
- You want to be on Black Arrow rather than NinjaTrader/Tradovate/MT5 for your Futures execution.
- You value Trustpilot density (22K+ reviews at 4.9) as your trust signal.
- You're comfortable with a per-program rule structure rather than a single firm-wide rule set.
- You want to be early on a new product (Futures Basecamp is still in its first 6 months of public availability as of May 2026).
Paul's setup at The 5%ers is the early-adopter example: Futures-only on Black Arrow, multiple evals passed, $9K paid out over three months on a clean bi-weekly cadence. If your strategy is Futures-led, The 5%ers is currently your only option of the two.
For traders who want both — running Forex on FTMO and Futures on The 5%ers — that's the most common dual-firm setup we see, and there's no exclusivity issue. The two firms aren't competing for the same execution; they're covering different asset classes.
The bottom line
FTMO and The 5%ers are the two most mature multi-asset-adjacent prop firms with EU-strong audiences, but they're not interchangeable. FTMO is the deeper Forex/CFD specialist now sitting on top of a regulated forex broker (OANDA) and offering 90% from day 1 on its 1-Step Challenge — a unique combination that's hard to match. The 5%ers is the broader multi-asset firm because its Black Arrow Futures track (beta since February 2026) opens an entire asset class FTMO doesn't touch, and its scaling ladder reaches 100% at the top.
The decision rule is asset-class first, then trust-signal preference: if you trade Forex/CFDs only and want regulator-adjacent legitimacy, FTMO. If you trade Futures or want to trade both under one roof, The 5%ers. Many serious traders end up running both, which is exactly what we've done — and the two firms cover each other's blind spots cleanly. For deeper rule and pricing detail, see our FTMO review and The 5%ers review; for related comparisons, see FTMO vs FundedNext, FTMO vs FundingPips, FTMO vs E8 Markets, and the FTMO 1-Step Challenge breakdown. For The 5%ers context, see The 5%ers Futures Basecamp, The 5%ers Bootcamp explained, The 5%ers vs Apex and The 5%ers Black Arrow platform guide. As of May 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FTMO better than The 5%ers in 2026?
Neither firm is universally better. FTMO is the deeper Forex/CFD specialist with a regulated-broker parent (OANDA) and a Forex-first toolkit. The 5%ers covers more ground because it adds a Futures track on Black Arrow on top of its four CFD programs. The right choice depends on which asset class you trade and how you weight broker regulation against multi-asset breadth.
Does The 5%ers offer Futures and FTMO does not?
Yes. The 5%ers launched a Futures Basecamp track on its proprietary Black Arrow platform in beta in February 2026, available on $25K and $50K sizes. FTMO is Forex and CFD only — it offers Forex, indices, commodities, metals and crypto CFDs, but no Futures contracts. If your strategy needs ES, NQ, CL or gold Futures, The 5%ers is the only option of the two.
Which firm is cheaper to start with?
FTMO's 1-Step Challenge starts around €79 for the $10K size, which is the lowest entry across both firms. The 2-Step Standard starts around €155 for $10K. The 5%ers' Hyper Growth and Bootcamp programs scale upward from the small-account tier. For larger accounts, both firms converge in the four-figure range, and pricing is rarely the deciding factor.
Are profit splits higher at The 5%ers or FTMO?
On paper The 5%ers reaches a higher ceiling — its scaling structure can take traders to 100% over time. FTMO's ceiling sits at 90%, but you reach it from day 1 on the 1-Step and via the Scaling Plan on the 2-Step. So FTMO is faster to a high split; The 5%ers is higher at the top end if you stick around long enough to scale.
Can US traders use both firms?
Yes, since 2025. FTMO relaunched US access in August 2025 via OANDA on MT5, becoming the first prop firm to offer MT5 to US traders. The 5%ers reopened the US in September 2025 via cTrader. Both firms now serve US-based applicants, but neither offers Futures to US traders through the same path retail Futures props use — FTMO has no Futures, and The 5%ers' Black Arrow Futures track operates separately from the CFD US flow.
Which firm has the bigger Trustpilot footprint?
The 5%ers carries roughly 22K to 25K Trustpilot reviews with a 4.9 score reported by third-party aggregators, putting it in the top tier of prop-firm Trustpilot footprints. FTMO does not lean on a public Trustpilot score in its marketing the same way, but its scale — 3.5M+ customers and over $500M in cumulative payouts — speaks to a far larger user base. Different signals, both strong.
Did FTMO get acquired in 2025?
FTMO did not get acquired — FTMO did the acquiring. FTMO bought OANDA, one of the oldest regulated forex brokers, in a deal announced February 2025 and completed December 2025. FTMO founders Otakar Šuffner and Marek Vašíček became co-CEOs of OANDA in March 2026. The 5%ers had no comparable corporate event in this period.
Does The 5%ers have a 1-Step option like FTMO?
Yes. The 5%ers offers two 1-step CFD programs — Hyper Growth and the newer ProGrowth (added April 2026) — alongside its 2-step High Stakes and 3-step Bootcamp paths. FTMO offers a 1-Step Challenge with a 10% target, 3% daily loss and 10% trailing max loss, plus the classic 2-Step. So both firms have 1-step paths, but the rule structures and scaling models differ.
Which firm pays out faster?
Both run on bi-weekly payout cadences in their default flow. FTMO advertises an average 8-hour processing time once a payout request clears review. The 5%ers also runs bi-weekly with a $150 minimum and processes via Rise, crypto and bank transfer (3.5% fee on those rails, $1,500 max per crypto cycle). In practical terms, either firm can deliver funds within hours when the request is clean.
Which firm is better for European traders?
Both have strong European positioning. FTMO is Czech-headquartered and culturally European-trader-aligned, with EUR-priced challenges and EU business hours support. The 5%ers is Israeli-headquartered with a heavy European audience and the same EUR-friendly billing. For a Forex-first European trader, FTMO is often the default. For a multi-asset European trader, The 5%ers matches and adds Futures.
Has Paul actually traded both firms?
Yes. Paul has traded FTMO for around four years on the 1-Step Challenge across Standard $50K and $100K sizes, scalp style, with about $15K withdrawn in real payouts across multiple accounts. He has also traded The 5%ers' Futures track on Black Arrow as one of the early-adopter beta traders since February 2026, passing multiple evaluations and pulling $9K in payouts over three months. Both relationships are first-hand, not theoretical.
Can I run an FTMO account and a The 5%ers account at the same time?
Yes. The two firms have no exclusivity clauses with each other, and both allow concurrent accounts within their own ecosystems. Many traders deliberately split across both — running Forex strategies on FTMO and Futures on The 5%ers' Black Arrow — to diversify firm risk and asset coverage. Just keep separate equity tracking so you don't accidentally cross-apply rules.