Earn2Trade's structural moat is the education-prop hybrid model + published 8.89% pass rate transparency — neither offered by Apex, Topstep, or most futures-prop peers. Full Earn2Trade picture in the complete review. Sign up at Earn2Trade.
Two futures prop firms, both newer-school in their positioning, and both genuinely worth a look in 2026. They're solving different problems for different traders.
Earn2Trade built its identity around the idea that most retail futures traders need structure and education before they can survive a live account. The Trader Career Path (TCP) is literally a career path: five stages from $25K up to $200K, with a free video library and webinar program bundled into every subscription. The firm publicly discloses an 8.89% pass rate. That kind of transparency is rare in this industry.
Tradeify took a different angle. Their 3.0 overhaul scrapped subscription pricing, introduced three distinct account families, and leaned into EOD trailing drawdown as a core selling point. The 90% profit split (100% on first $15K for Growth and Lightning) is one of the highest headline numbers in the futures prop space.
This comparison breaks down where these firms actually differ, where the marketing numbers obscure the real tradeoffs, and which firm fits which trader profile.
Quick-Glance Comparison
| Attribute | Earn2Trade | Tradeify |
|---|---|---|
| Eval model | Multi-phase (TCP) or single-phase (Gauntlet Mini) | Eval (Select/Growth) or instant-funded (Lightning) |
| Profit split | 80% flat | 90% flat (Select); 100% first $15K then 90% (Growth/Lightning) |
| Max funding | $400K (verify multi-account policy) | $750K (5 stacked accounts) |
| Drawdown type (eval) | EOD | EOD trailing (Growth/Lightning); trailing (Select) |
| Pricing model | Monthly subscription | One-time purchase |
| Education layer | Yes (free library + webinars + Discord) | No |
| Platforms | Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Rithmic, Finamark | Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Rithmic, WealthCharts, TradeSea |
| Pass rate disclosed | 8.89% (2025, TCP) | Not disclosed |
| Asset class | Futures only (CME/COMEX/NYMEX/CBOT) | Futures only |
| Paul-tested | No (research-based) | Research-based |
Evaluation Structure: Ladder vs. One-Phase vs. No-Phase
Earn2Trade's two programs reflect two different trader philosophies.
The Trader Career Path is for traders who want to earn their size. You start at $25K, pass the evaluation, move to a $25K LiveSim account, then scale through $50K, $100K, and eventually $200K live accounts. Each stage has its own profit target and drawdown rules. The minimum trading day requirement is 10 days per phase. It's not a fast path. It's designed to build confidence incrementally, with the education layer reinforcing skills at each stage.
The Gauntlet Mini cuts the ladder entirely. Pass a single-phase evaluation at $50K, $100K, $150K, or $200K, get funded at that same size. No progression required. For traders who've already proven themselves elsewhere and don't need the career development framing, this is the practical option.
Tradeify runs three account families after the 3.0 overhaul:
- Select: Evaluation-based. After passing, you choose between Select Flex (no daily loss limit, 90% split, trailing drawdown continues) or Select Daily (DLL applies, daily payouts available). A 40% consistency rule applies throughout.
- Growth: Evaluation-based with a daily loss limit in both eval and funded phases. 100% profit split on first $15K, then 90/10. 35% consistency requirement in funded phase (slightly looser than Select).
- Lightning: No evaluation. You start trading live immediately. Same 100% first $15K / 90/10 split structure as Growth.
The Lightning option is a meaningful differentiator Earn2Trade simply doesn't offer. If you've been trading futures for years and don't want to prove yourself again, Lightning is a real shortcut. Earn2Trade's answer to that trader is the Gauntlet Mini, which still requires passing an eval.
Drawdown Mechanics: EOD Trailing on Both Sides
Both firms use end-of-day (EOD) trailing drawdown during evaluation phases. That's the most important thing they share. EOD trailing means the drawdown floor only recalculates once per day after the session closes, not tick by tick during the session. Intraday swings that give back unrealized profits don't push the floor up. Only your closing balance does.
That distinction matters enormously for day traders and scalpers. Real-time trailing drawdown punishes you for every intraday peak. EOD doesn't. Choosing between these two firms on drawdown alone isn't straightforward. Both use EOD during evals.
The differences emerge at the funded stage.
For Earn2Trade TCP, the drawdown mechanics change as you move up the ladder:
| TCP Phase | Account Size | Drawdown Type | Drawdown Amount | Daily Loss Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation | $25K | EOD | $1,500 | $550 |
| LiveSim | $25K | EOD | $1,500 | $550 |
| Live | $25K | Trailing | $1,500 | $550 |
| Live | $50K | Trailing | $2,000 | $1,100 |
| Live | $100K | Trailing | $3,500 | $2,200 |
| Live | $200K | Fixed/static | ~$194K balance floor | $4,400 |
The $200K stage converts to a static drawdown once you reach a certain high-water mark. The exact lock mechanic should be verified on earn2trade.com, but the $194K floor figure is confirmed from live-facts.
For Tradeify Growth (the most comparable product given its EOD structure), it's cleaner: EOD trailing through both eval and funded, with the floor only moving based on closing balance. Select accounts on the Flex path use a trailing drawdown on the funded side, similar to TCP's live accounts. Select Daily adds a per-day loss limit with a $1,100 buffer on the 25K tier.
If you want the most forgiving drawdown mechanic through the widest funded range, Tradeify Growth's consistent EOD trailing from eval to funded is the cleaner structure. Earn2Trade's transition from EOD to trailing on live TCP accounts introduces a shift mid-journey.
Profit Split: 80% vs. 90% — What the Numbers Actually Mean
Earn2Trade pays 80% on all funded accounts: both TCP and Gauntlet Mini, both LiveSim and Live. No scaling to higher percentages at large account sizes, no first-withdrawal bonuses. Straightforward.
Tradeify's headline numbers are higher, but structured differently depending on account type:
- Select (Flex and Daily): 90% from first withdrawal. Flat.
- Growth and Lightning: 100% of the first $15,000 in profits, then 90/10 after that. Plus the Elite Live Performance Reward Pool: an additional $2,000 to $18,000 per funded account on top of regular profits, paid out separately.
The 10-point gap (80% vs. 90%) compounds at scale. On a $10,000 withdrawal, Earn2Trade pays $8,000. Tradeify Select pays $9,000. On a $5,000 withdrawal where you haven't yet cleared the $15K first-profits threshold on Growth, Tradeify Growth pays $5,000 (100%).
One thing to factor in: Earn2Trade's 80% split applies to both its LiveSim accounts and its Live accounts. The firm notes that 94.77% of passers stayed on LiveSim in 2025 rather than moving to live accounts. LiveSim payouts come from Earn2Trade's own funds. Only 5.23% of passers actually traded live accounts. Whether you read this as a caution (most traders never reach live status) or a data point (LiveSim still pays real money) depends on your priorities. Tradeify doesn't publish equivalent statistics.
Pricing: Subscription vs. One-Time Purchase
Earn2Trade uses a monthly subscription model. TCP pricing as confirmed from the pricing page:
| Program | Account Size | Monthly Fee |
|---|---|---|
| TCP | $25K | $150/month |
| TCP | $50K | $190/month |
| TCP | $100K | $350/month |
Note: the homepage has listed a "from $69/month" figure, which may be a promotional entry price vs. the standard rate. Verify the current pricing at earn2trade.com before purchasing. The reset fee is $65 if you need to restart the evaluation.
Tradeify switched to one-time pricing with the 3.0 overhaul. Select 25K is $109 one-time. Growth 25K is approximately $99 one-time. Lightning 25K is approximately $149 one-time.
If you pass an Earn2Trade evaluation in the first month, the one-time vs. subscription comparison isn't dramatic. If you take two months to pass, Tradeify's one-time pricing looks better. If you're on TCP25 and it takes three months, you've spent $450 vs. $99-$109 on Tradeify. The math favors Tradeify for traders who need time to develop consistency.
That said, the subscription model isn't inherently bad for TCP specifically. You're paying for ongoing access to Earn2Trade's education layer alongside the evaluation. If you're actively using the video library and webinars, the subscription includes real educational value beyond just the eval seat.
Education: Earn2Trade's Core Differentiator
The education comparison isn't close. Tradeify is a pure-prop firm: you buy an account, you trade, you get paid. No education layer. Solid firm, no complaints. Just not what they're selling.
Earn2Trade built its business around education being part of the product. Every TCP subscription includes a free video library and study guides. The help center runs 7 dedicated education articles under a "Mentors and webinars" category. There's an active Discord community. And the Beginner Crash Course is a standalone product listed alongside the two evaluation programs.
The 8.89% pass rate that Earn2Trade publishes openly on its homepage fits this framing. Most prop firms hide pass-rate data because it's uncomfortable. Earn2Trade leads with it. The implication: they know most traders fail, they're trying to help you avoid being one of them, and the education layer exists because the firm has a structural interest in traders passing rather than just in recurring subscription revenue.
If you're relatively new to futures trading or coming from equities/crypto and learning the CME instruments, Earn2Trade's educational scaffolding is a genuine edge. If you already know what you're doing, it's features you won't use and you're paying for them anyway.
Platforms: Near-Identical with Minor Differences
There's strong overlap between the two firms. Both support Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, and Rithmic. Earn2Trade adds Finamark (their proprietary branded platform, formerly Quantower-based). Tradeify adds WealthCharts and TradeSea after 3.0.
The practical difference is small. If you already trade on one of the shared platforms, either firm works. If you specifically want WealthCharts (popular in the retail community for its integrated scanners and chart tools), Tradeify has it. If you're interested in Earn2Trade's Finamark platform for its combined charting and prop-firm-specific features, that's unique to them.
Market data fees can apply depending on your CME Non-Professional vs. Professional status. Both firms note that traders should select Non-Professional status to avoid additional fees. Neither firm charges platform fees on top of the eval cost.
Asset Classes and Firm Positioning
Both firms are futures-only. This is worth stating clearly because several competing firms (like FTMO, FundedNext, or The 5%ers) operate in forex or multi-asset spaces. If you're a futures specialist, both Earn2Trade and Tradeify are in your lane.
Earn2Trade explicitly prohibits stocks, options, forex, cryptocurrency, and CFDs. Tradeify operates on the same CME/CBOT/NYMEX exchange infrastructure with similar restrictions.
This isn't a criticism of either firm. Futures-only positioning means the firms can optimize their evaluation rules, drawdown mechanics, and platform integrations specifically for the instrument class. The consistency rules, contract limits, and drawdown tables on both sites are futures-native, not adapted from a forex-first model.
Multi-Account and Scaling Potential
Tradeify explicitly allows stacking up to 5 accounts, giving traders $750,000 in combined buying power ($150,000 × 5). The Elite Live Performance Reward Pool stacks too: each funded account earns separately from the pool, and five accounts at Select (with the 1.5x multiplier) can unlock up to $90,000 in bonus payouts on top of trading profits.
Earn2Trade's $400,000 max funding figure appears in the propFirm data, but the exact stacking policy isn't confirmed on current product pages. The TCP ladder's single-account ceiling is $200K. Whether a second simultaneous account is permitted at Earn2Trade should be verified directly at earn2trade.com before planning a multi-account strategy.
For traders whose goal is maximum buying power with explicit documented support for parallel accounts, Tradeify's 5-account stacking policy is clearer and more aggressively designed.
Who Each Firm Actually Suits
Earn2Trade is the right call if:
- You're newer to futures trading or coming from another asset class and need the education layer
- You value transparent pass-rate and payout data when choosing a firm
- The TCP ladder's structured career progression appeals to your development style
- You want a single-phase fast-track option (Gauntlet Mini) without switching to a completely different firm
- You prefer knowing that 8.89% pass rate data means the firm has a genuine interest in helping you succeed
Tradeify makes more sense if:
- You want the highest headline profit split (90% flat, 100% on first $15K for Growth/Lightning)
- EOD trailing drawdown through both evaluation and funded phases is a priority
- You don't want to pay a subscription — one-time pricing fits your risk tolerance better
- You're an experienced futures trader who doesn't need educational scaffolding
- You want instant-funded access without any evaluation (Lightning accounts)
- Multi-account scaling to $750K with explicit firm support is on your roadmap
Both firms sit comfortably in the same futures-focused prop space. Neither is a bad choice. The decision comes down to whether you're paying for education and career structure (Earn2Trade) or pure-prop mechanics and split percentages (Tradeify).
How They Compare to Other Futures Firms
Both Earn2Trade and Tradeify occupy the newer-school end of the futures prop spectrum. Neither has the decade-plus track record of Topstep or Apex Trader Funding, but both have been operating long enough to have meaningful payout histories.
For comparison, TakeProfitTrader runs a similar evaluation model with strong payout volume (~$20K+ withdrawn by Paul's research base). Bulenox focuses on high-frequency scalpers with 90%/weekly payout mechanics. TradeDay offers three drawdown types across 9 SKUs. Alpha Futures uses a trailing maximum loss limit (TMLL) that differs mechanically from both Earn2Trade and Tradeify. Elite Trader Funding is another newer-school option worth shortlisting if you're building a comparison set.
None of those comparisons replace the Earn2Trade vs. Tradeify decision. If your shortlist is specifically these two, the drawdown mechanics and profit split structure are close enough that the education layer and pricing model become the deciding factors.
The bottom line
Earn2Trade and Tradeify are the two most education-conscious and transparency-forward futures prop firms currently operating in the space. They just define "transparency" differently.
Earn2Trade is transparent about difficulty: publishing pass rates, LiveSim vs. Live splits, and payout activity data is unusual in this industry, and it reflects an educational philosophy that distinguishes the firm from pure-eval operations.
Tradeify is transparent about structure: one-time pricing, clearly documented EOD trailing drawdown mechanics, three distinct account families, and a 90%+ profit split are all front-and-center in their marketing and help center.
The trader who should pick Earn2Trade is still learning the craft and wants a firm that's invested in their development. The trader who should pick Tradeify already knows how to trade and wants the best mechanical terms available at this account size.
Neither firm requires a massive initial outlay. Try one, evaluate the experience, and revisit the other if your needs change.
Full reviews: Earn2Trade | Tradeify
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Earn2Trade or Tradeify better for beginners?
Earn2Trade has the stronger case for beginners. The TCP ladder starts at $25K, the education layer is included in every subscription, and the 5-stage structure builds confidence incrementally rather than dumping you into a large funded account immediately. Tradeify's Lightning instant-funded accounts are designed for experienced traders who don't need an evaluation phase.
Which firm has the higher profit split?
Tradeify. Growth and Lightning accounts keep 100% of the first $15,000 in profits, then switch to 90/10. Select accounts start at a flat 90%. Earn2Trade pays 80% across the board. The 10-percentage-point gap compounds at scale: on a $10K withdrawal, Tradeify Select pays $1,000 more than Earn2Trade.
Does Earn2Trade or Tradeify have more forgiving drawdown?
They're comparable at the evaluation phase. Both use EOD drawdown, meaning the floor only updates once after market close. At the funded stage, Tradeify Growth keeps EOD trailing consistently. Earn2Trade TCP converts to trailing (real-time) on live accounts from $25K to $100K, then to fixed/static at $200K. For traders who want EOD trailing all the way through funded status, Tradeify Growth has the edge.
Which firm is cheaper to start with?
Tradeify's Growth 25K is approximately $99 one-time. Earn2Trade TCP25 is $150/month subscription. If you pass in one month, costs are close. Two months of TCP25 subscription ($300) vs. one Tradeify Growth 25K purchase ($99): Tradeify is significantly cheaper on a time-adjusted basis. If you use Earn2Trade's education features actively, the subscription cost represents real educational value.
Can you hold positions overnight with either firm?
Overnight and weekend holding rules are not explicitly confirmed on Earn2Trade's current product pages. Verify directly at earn2trade.com before placing overnight positions. Tradeify's overnight rules also vary by account family; check help.tradeify.co for current policy.
Does Earn2Trade offer instant funding like Tradeify Lightning?
No. Both TCP and Gauntlet Mini require passing an evaluation. Tradeify Lightning skips the evaluation entirely and gives immediate live access. If instant funding is a priority, Tradeify is the only option between these two.
Which firm discloses more publicly?
Earn2Trade publishes pass rate (8.89%), live vs. LiveSim split (5.23%/94.77%), and payout activity rates (18% of funded accounts withdrew in 2025). Tradeify does not publish equivalent statistics. For traders who want to see firm-level data before committing, Earn2Trade's transparency is a genuine differentiator.
What platforms do both firms support?
Shared: Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Rithmic. Earn2Trade also supports Finamark. Tradeify adds WealthCharts and TradeSea. If you use any of the four shared platforms, both firms are compatible.
Does Earn2Trade have a multi-account option like Tradeify?
Earn2Trade's multi-account stacking policy isn't clearly documented on current product pages. Verify at earn2trade.com. The $400K max funding figure may refer to total across multiple accounts. Tradeify explicitly documents up to 5 stacked accounts for $750K combined buying power.
Which firm is better if I want to scale to large account sizes?
Tradeify's documented 5-account stacking policy gives a clear path to $750K buying power. Earn2Trade's TCP ladder tops out at $200K per account on the live tier. For traders prioritizing maximum buying power with firm-level documentation, Tradeify has the clearer advantage.
Is Earn2Trade a scam?
No credible evidence points to Earn2Trade being a scam. The firm has operated since approximately 2019, publishes transparent performance data on its homepage, and maintains an active help center and Discord community. Trustpilot reviews are variable — check trustpilot.com/review/earn2trade.com for current ratings before committing.
Does Tradeify have education like Earn2Trade?
No. Tradeify is a pure-prop evaluation firm with no bundled education layer. Earn2Trade's free video library, webinars, and TCP structure are differentiators that Tradeify doesn't match. If education matters to your decision, Earn2Trade wins this category outright.