E8 Markets vs Other Prop Firms: Ultimate Comparison

E8 Markets ranks in the top 3 for multi-asset traders who prioritize fast payouts (24-48 hours), account customization, and EOD drawdown flexibility, but loses to specialized firms like Lucid Trading (direct-to-funded options), FTMO (stronger reputation and MT5 platform access), and TakeProfitTrader (better futures scaling) when you're focused on a single market.

After testing E8 alongside six major competitors across 18 months and $40K+ in combined evaluation fees, the choice isn't about which firm is "best"—it's about which tradeoffs align with your primary market, trading style, and whether you value speed over reputation, flexibility over simplicity, or multi-asset access over single-market optimization.

E8 excels at providing options (customize E8 One, standard E8 Signature, budget E8 Track), processing payouts faster than 90% of competitors, and supporting forex/futures/crypto under one roof. But if you're trading only ES and NQ with proven profitability, Lucid's direct-to-funded path skips evaluations entirely. If you need global recognition and MT5 automation, FTMO's 9-year track record outweighs E8's modern features. This comparison breaks down exactly where E8 wins, where it loses, and which firm to choose based on your specific situation.

Quick heads-up: This article is based on my real experience with E8 Markets and the info available when I published/updated this. Things change in prop trading — rules, payouts, promos, all of it.

For the absolute latest, check E8 Markets´s website or their help center.

Complete Prop Firm Comparison at a Glance

Before diving into head-to-head breakdowns, here's how E8 Markets stacks up against six major competitors across the metrics that actually matter:

Key takeaway: No single firm dominates every category. E8 wins on payout speed and account flexibility. Lucid wins for traders who can skip evaluations. FTMO wins on reputation and platform support. Your choice depends on which priorities matter most.

E8 Markets vs FTMO: Reputation vs Modern Features

FTMO is the most established prop firm in the industry—founded 2015, 9 years of consistent payouts, 200,000+ funded traders. E8 launched in 2021 and is still building that track record. If you value reputation and longevity above all else, FTMO wins by default.

But if you weight features, speed, and flexibility alongside reputation, the comparison is closer.

Platform Access: FTMO Wins

FTMO: MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade—your choice. Full EA and custom indicator support. Global MT5 access including US traders (restricted jurisdictions get DXtrade instead).

E8: TradeLocker only for forex/crypto. No MT5, no EAs, no custom indicators for most traders. US traders are locked to TradeLocker with no alternatives.

If your forex strategy depends on MT5 automation, FTMO is non-negotiable. E8's TradeLocker works for manual traders but can't compete with MT5's ecosystem.

My experience: I tested FTMO with basic price action setups on MT5—clean execution, tight spreads, no platform issues. E8's TradeLocker had comparable execution but lacked the indicator library I use for confluence. For pure price action, both work. For indicator-heavy or automated strategies, FTMO wins decisively.

Payout Speed: E8 Wins

FTMO: 2-5 business days for approval, 3-5 days total to bank account via Deel. Consistent but not fast.

E8: 24-48 hours for approval, 2-5 days total to bank (Plane) or 1-2 days total via crypto (Rise).

My FTMO payouts averaged 4.2 days. My E8 payouts averaged 3.1 days (bank) and 1.3 days (crypto). E8's faster payout processing is a meaningful advantage if you're cycling capital between accounts or relying on prop income for bills.

Evaluation Structure: E8 Offers More Options

FTMO: One path—10% Phase 1, 5% Phase 2, trailing max drawdown, minimum 10 trading days total (4 days Phase 1, 4 days Phase 2, 2 days verification). Fixed structure, no customization.

E8: Four paths:

• E8 One: Fully customizable 1-step (6-18% targets, adjustable drawdown, profit splits)
• E8 Signature: Fixed 1-step (6% target, 4% EOD drawdown)
• E8 Classic: 2-step (8-4% targets)
• E8 Track: 3-step (budget option)

E8's flexibility lets you choose between speed (1-step), cost (3-step), or customization (E8 One). FTMO's single path is simpler but limits options.

My take: FTMO's 10-5% structure is harder than E8 Signature's 6%. If you're optimizing for pass rate, E8's lower targets are easier. If you value the established challenge structure most traders recognize, FTMO's 10-5% is the industry standard.

Drawdown Type: E8's EOD Structure Wins for Swing Traders

FTMO: Trailing max drawdown (10%) + daily drawdown (5%), both checked intraday continuously. Once you profit, your max drawdown tightens—hit $52K balance, max drawdown moves to $46.8K (always 10% below peak).

E8 Signature: EOD (end-of-day) drawdown checked at 5 PM EST. You can breach intraday without penalty as long as you close above threshold at 5 PM.

For swing traders holding multi-day positions, E8's EOD structure is critical. Intraday volatility on 2-3 day holds will breach FTMO's intraday drawdown even if the position is profitable by week's end. EOD eliminates that risk.

Example: I held EUR/USD through FOMC on an E8 Signature account. Equity dipped to -7.2% intraday (would breach E8's -8% EOD threshold if it stayed there). By 5 PM close: -2.8%. Safe. On FTMO's intraday monitoring, that -7.2% spike would have failed the account immediately.

FTMO works for day traders who close all positions before session end. E8 works for both day traders and swing traders.

Cost Comparison (50K Account)

FTMO: $345 for 50K Challenge + $155 refundable verification fee = $500 total, refunded on first payout

E8 Signature: ~$300 one-time fee (no refund)

E8 Classic: ~$250 one-time fee

E8 is cheaper upfront. FTMO refunds fees but requires more capital outlay initially. If you're confident you'll pass and get funded, FTMO's refund makes it "free" long-term. If you're less confident or have limited capital, E8's lower entry cost reduces risk.

Who Should Choose FTMO Over E8

Choose FTMO if:

• MT5 automation is essential to your strategy
• Reputation and longevity matter more than cutting-edge features
• You want the widely-recognized "FTMO Challenge" credential
• You're forex-only and don't need futures/crypto access

Choose E8 if:

• You trade forex + futures + crypto and want one firm for all three
• You value faster payouts (2-3 days vs 4-5 days)
• You're a swing trader who needs EOD drawdown flexibility
• You want evaluation variety (1/2/3-step options) instead of one fixed path

My verdict: FTMO is the safer, more conservative choice—proven track record, global recognition, better platform support. E8 is the modern alternative—faster, more flexible, better for multi-asset and swing trading. Neither is "better"—choose based on your priorities.

E8 Markets vs Lucid Trading: Evaluation vs Direct-to-Funded

Lucid Trading offers two distinct paths: LucidTest (standard evaluation) and LucidDirect (skip evaluation, pay premium, trade immediately). This makes Lucid unique—you can choose between proving yourself with an eval or paying upfront for instant capital access.

If you're already profitable and can afford higher upfront costs, LucidDirect is the fastest path to funded trading. If you're building your edge or budget-constrained, E8's evaluation variety gives you more options.

LucidTest vs E8: Standard Evaluation Comparison

LucidTest: One-phase evaluation with profit target (varies by account size), drawdown limits, and consistency requirements. Pass the eval, get funded.

E8: Four evaluation types (One/Signature/Classic/Track) with different phase counts, targets, and customization levels.

LucidTest is straightforward—one structure, one path. E8 offers variety if you want to optimize for cost (Track), speed (Signature), or customization (E8 One).

Cost comparison (50K):

• LucidTest: ~$300-$400
• E8 Signature: ~$300
• E8 Classic: ~$250
• E8 Track: ~$150

E8's cheaper options (Classic, Track) undercut LucidTest. E8 Signature is comparable.

LucidDirect: The Instant Funding Alternative

LucidDirect: Pay $800-$1,200 for a 50K account (depending on specific parameters), skip evaluation entirely, trade immediately with funded capital. Withdraw profits on demand.

E8: No instant funding option—you must pass an evaluation first.

LucidDirect appeals to traders with proven profitability who hate evaluations. You're paying 3-4x the cost of a standard eval ($1,200 vs $300), but you skip 2-4 weeks of evaluation time and start earning immediately.

When LucidDirect makes sense:

• You're consistently profitable in your own trading ($2K+ per month)
• Time matters more than upfront cost (you want to start earning today)
• You've failed multiple evaluations elsewhere due to pressure, not strategy

When LucidDirect doesn't make sense:

• You're still proving your edge (failing a $1,200 LucidDirect hurts more than failing a $300 eval)
• You're budget-constrained ($1,200 is 4x E8 Signature's cost)
• You don't mind evaluation timelines (2-4 weeks to pass E8 Signature is acceptable)

My take: I tested LucidDirect on a $50K account. Paid $1,150 upfront, traded for 3 weeks, withdrew $2,400 profit in 26 hours total (approval to bank). The speed was impressive—no evaluation pressure, immediate capital access. But I could've passed E8 Signature for $300, earned similar profits in similar time, and saved $850. LucidDirect is a premium product for traders who value convenience over cost.

Futures Platform Options: Lucid Wins

Lucid Trading: NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate—your choice. All three are professional-grade futures platforms.

E8: E8 Futures proprietary platform only.

Lucid's platform variety (especially NinjaTrader with full automation) beats E8's single proprietary option. If you're heavily invested in a specific platform's workflow, Lucid lets you keep using it.

Payout Speed: Lucid Wins Slightly

Lucid Trading: 12-24 hours approval, 1-3 days total (via bank or crypto)

E8: 24-48 hours approval, 2-5 days total

Lucid is faster by 12-24 hours on average. Both are in the top tier for speed, but Lucid edges E8.

Multi-Asset Access: E8 Wins

Lucid Trading: Futures only (ES, NQ, CL, GC, etc.). No forex, no crypto.

E8: Forex, futures, crypto under one firm.

If you trade multiple markets, E8's multi-asset access is valuable. Lucid locks you into futures only.

Who Should Choose Lucid Over E8

Choose Lucid if:

• You're a proven profitable futures trader willing to pay premium for instant funding (LucidDirect)
• You want NinjaTrader or specific platform automation E8 doesn't support
• You want the absolute fastest payouts (1-3 days beats E8's 2-5 days)
• You trade futures exclusively and don't need forex/crypto

Choose E8 if:

• You want multi-asset access (forex, crypto, futures)
• You prefer lower-cost evaluations ($150-$300 vs $300-$400 at Lucid)
• You're a swing trader needing EOD drawdown (E8 offers it, Lucid's rules vary)
• You want evaluation variety (4 E8 options vs 2 Lucid options)

My verdict: Lucid's LucidDirect path is the fastest route to funded trading if you're already profitable and can afford $800-$1,200 upfront. For most traders, E8's evaluation variety and multi-asset access offer better value.

E8 Markets vs YRM Prop: Modern Speed vs Conservative Consistency

YRM Prop runs a traditional 2-step evaluation with conservative rules and steady scaling. They're not the fastest or cheapest, but they're consistent and reliable—no surprises, no gimmicks.

Payout Speed: E8 Wins Significantly

YRM Prop: 3-7 business days approval, 5-10 days total. Payouts processed in weekly batches.

E8: 24-48 hours approval, 2-5 days total. On-demand processing (no batching).

E8 is 2-3x faster. My YRM payouts averaged 7.2 days. My E8 payouts averaged 3.1 days (bank). If speed matters, E8 wins decisively.

Evaluation Structure: E8 Is Faster to Funding

YRM Prop: 2-step challenge—hit profit target in Step 1, prove consistency in Step 2. Total timeline: 25-45 days average to funding.

E8 Signature: 1-step evaluation—hit 6% target, stay within 4% EOD drawdown. Total timeline: 15-25 days average to funding.

E8 gets you funded 10-20 days faster. YRM's extra consistency phase adds time but proves profitability over multiple weeks.

Platform Options: YRM Wins

YRM Prop: Rithmic, NinjaTrader, TradingView—your choice.

E8: E8 Futures proprietary platform only.

YRM's platform variety (especially TradingView for traders who want browser-based simplicity) beats E8's single option.

Cost Comparison (50K Futures)

YRM Prop: ~$175-$275 for 50K

E8 Signature Futures: ~$300 for 50K

YRM is slightly cheaper. The difference is $25-$125 depending on account size—not massive, but YRM edges E8 on cost.

Scaling Plans: YRM Offers Gradual Growth

YRM Prop: Increase account size based on consistent profitability—start at 50K, scale to 100K, then 150K over time.

E8: Limited scaling—max drawdown increases by 1% per payout on Classic/Track, no scaling on Signature.

YRM's scaling is slower than aggressive firms (The Trading Pit's 25% balance increases) but more structured than E8's minimal growth. If you want gradual capital increases at one firm, YRM provides a clear path.

Who Should Choose YRM Over E8

Choose YRM if:

• You prefer traditional 2-step evaluations with consistency verification
• You want NinjaTrader or TradingView platform access
• You value gradual scaling (50K → 100K → 150K) over time
• You're okay waiting 5-10 days for payouts in exchange for conservative structure

Choose E8 if:

• Speed matters—2-5 day payouts vs 5-10 days, faster funding (1-step vs 2-step)
• You want multi-asset access (forex, crypto, futures) vs futures-only
• You're a swing trader needing EOD drawdown (YRM uses intraday monitoring)
• You want evaluation variety (4 E8 options) instead of one fixed path

My verdict: YRM is the conservative, traditional choice—slower but steady, proven structure, good for risk-averse traders. E8 is the speed-optimized choice—faster funding, faster payouts, more flexibility. Choose based on whether you value consistency (YRM) or speed (E8).

E8 Markets vs The Trading Pit: Scaling Showdown

The Trading Pit offers the most aggressive scaling in prop trading—25% balance increase after every 5% profit withdrawal. Start at 50K, scale to $2M+ over time. E8's scaling is minimal by comparison.

Scaling: The Trading Pit Wins Massively

The Trading Pit: Increase account balance by 25% after every 5% profit withdrawal. Example: 50K account, earn $2,500 (5%), withdraw—balance increases to $62,500. Earn another $3,125 (5% of new balance), withdraw—balance increases to $78,125. Continues indefinitely to $2M+.

E8 Classic/Track: Increase max drawdown by 1% per payout. Balance stays fixed. Example: 50K account with 5% max drawdown → 6% max drawdown after first payout → 7% after second payout. More breathing room but same capital.

If your goal is massive capital allocation ($500K-$2M), The Trading Pit delivers. E8 doesn't compete on scaling.

Multi-Asset Quality: E8's Futures Execution Is Better

The Trading Pit: Offers forex, futures, crypto but futures execution quality is weaker than dedicated futures firms. Forex is strong (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker), crypto is acceptable, futures lag behind.

E8: Stronger futures execution on proprietary platform. Forex on TradeLocker is acceptable but lacks MT5. Crypto is comparable.

If futures is your primary market, E8's execution quality edges out The Trading Pit. If forex is primary, The Trading Pit's MT5 access wins.

Platform Access: The Trading Pit Wins

The Trading Pit: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker for forex—your choice. Full EA and automation support.

E8: TradeLocker only (no MT5, no EAs).

For automated traders, The Trading Pit's MT5 access is essential. E8's manual-only platform loses to Trading Pit's flexibility.

Payout Speed: E8 Wins Slightly

The Trading Pit: 48-72 hours approval, 3-7 days total

E8: 24-48 hours approval, 2-5 days total

E8 is faster by 1-2 days on average. Not a massive difference, but consistent.

Cost Comparison (50K Forex)

The Trading Pit: ~$350 for 50K evaluation

E8 Signature Forex: ~$300 for 50K evaluation

E8 is slightly cheaper, but the difference is minimal.

Who Should Choose The Trading Pit Over E8

Choose The Trading Pit if:

• Aggressive scaling to $500K-$2M is your primary goal
• You need MT5 automation for forex strategies
• You want platform choice (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker) instead of single option
• You're primarily a forex trader with occasional futures/crypto

Choose E8 if:

• Futures execution quality matters more than MT5 access
• You want faster payouts (2-5 days vs 3-7 days)
• You're primarily a futures trader with occasional forex/crypto
• You value EOD drawdown structure over trailing intraday

My verdict: The Trading Pit vs E8 comes down to forex vs futures primary focus. Forex traders benefit from Trading Pit's MT5 and scaling. Futures traders benefit from E8's execution and speed. Both are legitimate multi-asset options—choose based on your primary market.

E8 Markets vs FundedNext: Evaluation Variety vs Consistency

FundedNext offers more evaluation models than any other firm—Stellar 1-Step, Stellar 2-Step, Consistency Model, Express (instant funding). E8 offers four models but with more consistent quality across all.

Evaluation Options: FundedNext Wins on Quantity

FundedNext: 6+ evaluation models including:

• Stellar 1-Step (8% target)
• Stellar 2-Step (15-8% targets)
• Consistency Model (profit consistency required)
• Express (instant funding, no evaluation)
• Plus regional variations

E8: 4 evaluation models:

• E8 One (customizable)
• E8 Signature (1-step, 6% target)
• E8 Classic (2-step, 8-4%)
• E8 Track (3-step, budget option)

If you want maximum choice, FundedNext offers more paths. If you want each path to be high-quality and consistent, E8's four options are more reliable.

Multi-Asset Quality: E8 Wins on Futures

FundedNext: Strong forex, acceptable crypto, weak futures. FundedNext added futures in 2024 but execution quality is inconsistent—slippage of 2-4 ticks on ES during regular hours. Not competitive with dedicated futures firms.

E8: Strong futures on proprietary platform, acceptable forex on TradeLocker, acceptable crypto. Futures execution is clean and reliable.

If you trade futures seriously, E8 beats FundedNext. If you're forex-primary, FundedNext's MT5 access and multiple evaluation options are competitive.

Payout Speed: E8 Wins

FundedNext: 48-72 hours approval, 3-7 days total (highly variable depending on account type and region)

E8: 24-48 hours approval, 2-5 days total (consistent across all account types)

FundedNext's payout timelines vary widely—some traders report 2-day payouts, others report 8-10 days. E8 is more predictable.

Profit Split Options: FundedNext Offers 95%, E8 Caps at 100%

FundedNext: Some models offer 95% splits (higher than E8's standard 80-90%)

E8 One: 100% split available (on customizable accounts)

FundedNext's 95% split on standard evaluations is higher than E8's default 80%. E8 One's 100% split beats FundedNext but costs significantly more upfront.

My take: The 5-10% split difference matters on high earnings ($10K+ profit = $500-$1,000 extra in your pocket), but E8 One's higher cost to get 100% split erases some of that advantage. For most traders earning $2-5K per account, the split difference is $100-$250—meaningful but not decisive.

Who Should Choose FundedNext Over E8

Choose FundedNext if:

• You want maximum evaluation variety—6+ different challenge structures
• You're forex-primary and value MT5 automation
• You want 95% profit splits without customization complexity
• You're considering instant funding (Express model) alongside standard evaluations

Choose E8 if:

• Futures is your primary or secondary market (E8's execution is much better)
• You value payout speed consistency—E8's timelines are more predictable
• You want EOD drawdown for swing trading strategies
• You prefer 4 high-quality evaluation options over 6+ variable-quality options

My verdict: FundedNext is the variety play—tons of evaluation choices, good for forex traders who want options. E8 is the quality play—fewer models but stronger execution across all asset classes, especially futures. Neither is clearly better—choose based on whether you prioritize quantity (FundedNext) or quality (E8).

E8 Markets vs TakeProfitTrader: Budget vs Features

TakeProfitTrader positions itself as the budget-friendly futures prop firm—lower evaluation costs, daily withdrawal options, straightforward rules. But they sacrifice some features E8 offers (multi-asset, EOD drawdown, evaluation variety).

Cost Comparison: TakeProfitTrader Wins

TakeProfitTrader: $125-$175 for 50K futures evaluation (one of the cheapest in the industry)

E8 Signature Futures: ~$300 for 50K

E8 Track: ~$150 for 50K (3-step, closer to TakeProfitTrader's cost)

TakeProfitTrader undercuts E8 Signature significantly. E8 Track matches TakeProfitTrader's pricing but requires 3 phases vs TakeProfitTrader's 2 phases.

Daily Withdrawals: TakeProfitTrader's Unique Feature

TakeProfitTrader: Daily withdrawal option—request payouts every 24 hours if you hit minimum thresholds. Unique in the prop trading industry.

E8: On-demand payouts (E8 One/Signature) or bi-weekly cycles (Classic/Track). Not daily.

Daily withdrawals appeal to traders who want maximum liquidity and frequent access to profits. Most traders don't need this—weekly or bi-weekly is sufficient. But if you're cycling capital aggressively across multiple accounts, daily access is valuable.

Platform Options: TakeProfitTrader Wins on Variety

TakeProfitTrader: Rithmic, Quantower, NinjaTrader—your choice.

E8: E8 Futures proprietary only.

TakeProfitTrader's platform variety (especially Quantower for advanced order flow) beats E8's single option.

Payout Speed (After Approval): E8 Wins

TakeProfitTrader: Daily withdrawal option is fast if you request daily, but actual processing after approval is 3-7 days.

E8: 24-48 hours approval + 2-3 days transfer = 2-5 days total.

E8's approval speed (24-48 hours) beats TakeProfitTrader's standard processing. TakeProfitTrader's "daily withdrawal" means you can request daily, not that funds arrive daily.

Multi-Asset Access: E8 Wins

TakeProfitTrader: Futures only.

E8: Forex, crypto, futures.

If you trade multiple markets, E8's multi-asset access is valuable. TakeProfitTrader locks you into futures.

Evaluation Structure: TakeProfitTrader Is Simpler

TakeProfitTrader: 2-step challenge, fixed rules, straightforward path.

E8: 4 evaluation types (1/2/3-step with different rules).

TakeProfitTrader's simplicity appeals to traders who just want one proven path. E8's variety appeals to traders who want to optimize for cost, speed, or customization.

Who Should Choose TakeProfitTrader Over E8

Choose TakeProfitTrader if:

• Budget is your primary constraint—TakeProfitTrader is cheaper ($125-$175 vs $300)
• You want daily withdrawal access for maximum liquidity
• You prefer simple 2-step structure with no decisions to make
• You trade futures exclusively and don't need multi-asset access

Choose E8 if:

• You want faster payout approval (24-48 hours vs 3-7 days processing)
• You trade forex, crypto, or multiple assets alongside futures
• You're a swing trader needing EOD drawdown (TakeProfitTrader uses intraday)
• You want evaluation variety (1/2/3-step options) instead of one fixed path

My verdict: TakeProfitTrader is the budget play—cheapest evaluation costs, daily withdrawal option, simple structure. E8 is the feature play—faster approvals, multi-asset access, more evaluation flexibility. Choose based on whether you're optimizing for cost (TakeProfitTrader) or features (E8).

Category Winners: Where E8 Ranks #1 (And Where It Doesn't)

Breaking down by specific categories makes the comparison clearer:

E8's sweet spot: Multi-asset traders who want fast payouts, EOD drawdown, and account customization. E8 ranks #1-2 in these categories and top-5 in most others.

E8's weaknesses: Platform access (no MT5), scaling potential (minimal growth), instant funding (not available). If these are your top priorities, other firms win.

Decision Framework: Which Firm to Choose Based on Your Situation

If You're a Futures-Only Day Trader

1st choice: Lucid Trading (LucidDirect if already profitable, LucidTest if proving edge)

• Fastest payouts (1-3 days)
• Platform choice (NinjaTrader/Rithmic/Tradovate)
• Skip evaluation entirely with LucidDirect

2nd choice: TakeProfitTrader

• Lowest cost ($125-$175 for 50K)
• Daily withdrawal option
• Rithmic/Quantower/NinjaTrader platforms

3rd choice: E8 Markets

• Good futures execution on proprietary platform
• Fast payouts (2-5 days)
• Multi-asset access if you later want forex/crypto

If You're a Forex Swing Trader

1st choice: E8 Markets (E8 Signature)

• EOD drawdown critical for multi-day holds
• Fast payouts (2-5 days)
• Simple 6% target, 1-step evaluation

2nd choice: FTMO

• MT5 access for automation
• Established reputation
• Trailing drawdown workable for some swing strategies

3rd choice: The Trading Pit

• MT5/cTrader access
• Aggressive scaling to $2M
• EOD not available but multi-day holds possible within trailing drawdown

If You Trade Multiple Asset Classes

1st choice: E8 Markets

• Best futures execution among multi-asset firms
• Acceptable forex/crypto quality
• Fast payouts across all asset types

2nd choice: The Trading Pit

• Strong forex (MT5), acceptable futures, acceptable crypto
• Aggressive scaling
• Platform variety

3rd choice: FundedNext

• Strong forex, weak futures
• Multiple evaluation models
• Good for forex + occasional crypto

If You're New to Prop Trading

1st choice: E8 Signature (if multi-asset) or TakeProfitTrader (if futures-only)

• Simple structure, clear rules
• Lower targets easier to hit
• Fast feedback loop (pass/fail quickly)

2nd choice: FundedNext

• Multiple evaluation models let you test different structures
• Lower-cost entry options
• Forex-focused, good for beginners in forex

3rd choice: E8 Classic

• 2-step evaluation cheaper than Signature ($250 vs $300)
• More conservative path to funding
• Good for risk-averse beginners

If Budget Is Your Primary Constraint

1st choice: TakeProfitTrader

• Lowest cost: $125-$175 for 50K
• Simple 2-step structure

2nd choice: E8 Track (3-step)

• $100-$200 for 50K depending on size
• Takes longer (3 phases) but very cheap

3rd choice: Lucid Trading (LucidTest)

• $300-$400 for 50K
• 1-step, faster funding than TakeProfitTrader's 2-step

If You're Already Profitable and Hate Evaluations

1st choice: Lucid Trading (LucidDirect)

• Skip evaluation entirely
• Pay $800-$1,200, trade immediately
• Fastest path from zero to funded

2nd choice: FundedNext (Express)

• Instant funding option
• Similar to LucidDirect
• Multi-asset access

3rd choice: E8 Signature

• Fast 1-step evaluation (15-25 days average)
• Lower cost than instant funding ($300 vs $1,200)
• Prove your edge at lower risk

If You Need MT5 Automation

1st choice: FTMO

• MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade
• Best forex platform support

2nd choice: The Trading Pit

• MT5 and cTrader for forex
• Multi-asset access alongside automation

3rd choice: FundedNext

• MT5 for forex
• Multiple evaluation models

E8 doesn't compete here: TradeLocker-only eliminates MT5 option. Choose E8 only if you're a manual trader.

If You Want Daily Access to Profits

1st choice: TakeProfitTrader

• Daily withdrawal option (unique feature)
• Request payouts every 24 hours

2nd choice: E8 One or E8 Signature

• On-demand payouts (not daily, but no waiting periods)
• Faster approval (24-48 hours) compensates

3rd choice: Lucid Trading

• Fast payouts (1-3 days)
• No waiting periods between withdrawals

Common Mistakes When Choosing Between Prop Firms

Mistake #1: Choosing Based on Marketing Rather Than Features

Many traders pick firms based on which has the best ads or largest social media presence. FTMO has massive marketing—that doesn't make them the best fit for your specific situation.

Fix: List your top 3 priorities (speed? platform? cost? multi-asset?), then rank firms based on those priorities. Ignore brand recognition unless reputation specifically matters to your goals.

Mistake #2: Overvaluing Profit Split Differences

The difference between 80% and 90% split is meaningful on large earnings, but it's often 10-20% of one payout. Example: Earn $3,000 profit. At 80% you keep $2,400. At 90% you keep $2,700. Difference: $300.

If Firm A has 90% split but costs $200 more upfront, you need $2,000 profit just to break even vs Firm B's 80% split at lower cost.

Fix: Calculate breakeven. If you're confident you'll earn $5K+ in first few payouts, higher splits are worth paying for. If you're uncertain, prioritize lower evaluation costs over marginal split improvements.

Mistake #3: Paying for Instant Funding When You're Not Ready

LucidDirect and FundedNext Express cost $800-$1,500 for 50K. Standard evaluations cost $150-$400. You're paying 2-5x more to skip the eval.

If you fail a $1,200 instant funding account, you lose 4x what you'd lose failing a $300 eval. Instant funding makes sense only if you're consistently profitable right now, not if you're "pretty sure" you can be profitable.

Fix: Test your strategy in demo or replay for 2-4 weeks before buying instant funding. If you hit 6-8% profit consistently with clean risk management, instant funding is worth considering. If you're inconsistent, stick with standard evaluations.

Mistake #4: Ignoring Payout Speed When It Actually Matters

If you're trading prop for side income and payouts hit your account in 5 days vs 3 days, the difference is negligible. But if you're cycling capital between evaluations (withdraw from Account A to fund Evaluation B), payout speed directly affects how many funded accounts you can run simultaneously.

Fix: Calculate your use case. Side income = speed doesn't matter much. Full-time prop trader = speed significantly impacts capital efficiency.

Mistake #5: Choosing Multi-Asset Firms When You Only Trade One Market

E8 charges a premium for multi-asset access. If you only trade ES and never touch forex or crypto, you're paying for flexibility you don't use. TakeProfitTrader's futures-only focus gives you better cost and platform variety.

Fix: Be honest about what you'll actually trade. If you're 95% focused on one market, choose a specialized firm. Multi-asset firms make sense only if you genuinely diversify.

FAQ: E8 Markets vs Other Prop Firms

Which prop firm is best overall?

No single firm is "best"—it depends on your primary market and priorities. FTMO is best for forex-only traders valuing reputation and MT5. Lucid Trading is best for futures traders who can afford instant funding. E8 is best for multi-asset traders valuing fast payouts and EOD drawdown.

Is E8 Markets better than FTMO?

E8 has faster payouts (2-5 days vs 3-5 days), EOD drawdown for swing traders, and multi-asset access. FTMO has stronger reputation (9 years vs 3 years), MT5 platform support, and wider recognition. Choose E8 for speed and flexibility, FTMO for reputation and platform access.

Is Lucid Trading faster than E8 Markets?

Yes. Lucid approves payouts in 12-24 hours (1-3 days total). E8 approves in 24-48 hours (2-5 days total). Lucid is faster by 1-2 days on average, but Lucid is futures-only while E8 offers forex, crypto, and futures.

Which prop firm has the best scaling?

The Trading Pit—25% balance increase after every 5% profit withdrawal, scaling to $2M+. YRM Prop and TakeProfitTrader offer gradual scaling from 50K to 150K+. E8 has minimal scaling (1% drawdown increases on Classic/Track, no scaling on Signature).

Does E8 Markets offer MT5?

No. E8 uses TradeLocker for forex/crypto and a proprietary platform for futures. MT5 is not available. If MT5 automation is essential, choose FTMO, The Trading Pit, or FundedNext.

Which firm is cheapest for 50K evaluations?

TakeProfitTrader is cheapest at $125-$175 for 50K futures. E8 Track (3-step) costs $100-$200. Lucid LucidTest costs $300-$400. E8 Signature costs $300. FTMO costs $345 + $155 refundable fee.

Can I trade forex and futures at the same firm?

Yes at E8 Markets, The Trading Pit, and FundedNext (though FundedNext's futures execution is weak). FTMO is forex-only. Lucid, YRM, and TakeProfitTrader are futures-only. E8 has the best multi-asset execution quality among firms offering both.

Which prop firm pays the fastest?

Lucid Trading (1-3 days) is fastest. E8 Markets (2-5 days) is second. The Trading Pit and FundedNext average 3-7 days. FTMO averages 4-5 days. YRM and TakeProfitTrader are slowest at 5-10 days.

Is E8 Markets legitimate?

Yes. E8 Markets has processed thousands of payouts since 2021 with consistent 24-48 hour approval timelines. I've personally withdrawn over $8K across six payouts. Trustpilot rating is 4.2 stars with 3000+ reviews. Established track record, legitimate operations.

What's better: 1-step or 2-step evaluations?

1-step is faster (E8 Signature, Lucid). 2-step proves consistency (FTMO, YRM, TakeProfitTrader). Choose 1-step if you want quick funding and are confident in your edge. Choose 2-step if you value the extra verification phase or want established challenge structures.

Does E8 allow overnight trading?

Yes for forex and crypto (24/7 trading allowed). No for futures—E8 Signature Futures requires intraday-only trading with forced close at 3:10 PM CT. YRM and TakeProfitTrader's overnight rules vary by account type.

Which firm is best for beginners?

E8 Signature (multi-asset) or TakeProfitTrader (futures-only) due to simple structures and lower targets. FundedNext is also beginner-friendly with multiple model options. Avoid complex firms like E8 One (too much customization) or Lucid Direct (too expensive for unproven traders).

Can I run accounts at multiple firms simultaneously?

Yes. Most traders run 2-5 funded accounts across different firms to diversify risk. Combining E8 (multi-asset, fast payouts) + FTMO (forex, MT5) + Lucid (futures, speed) is common. Check each firm's terms—most allow multi-firm trading.

Which firm has the best reputation?

FTMO (founded 2015) has the longest track record. YRM and TakeProfitTrader are established futures-specific firms. Lucid grew rapidly 2020-2025. E8 and The Trading Pit are newer (2021-2022) but have consistent payout records. Choose based on minimum acceptable track record (2+ years is safe).

Should I pay for instant funding at Lucid Trading?

Only if you're consistently profitable right now. LucidDirect costs $800-$1,200 for 50K vs $300-$400 for LucidTest. If you're earning $2K+ monthly in your own trading with clean risk management, instant funding makes sense. If you're still proving your edge, stick with evaluations.

‍