TakeProfitTrader Reward Point Values

Understanding TakeProfitTrader's point values determines whether the rewards program is worth your time and how to optimize earning strategy. The base conversion is 100 points = $1, but actual value varies dramatically based on how you earn points (passing Tests gives 250 points = $2.50 effective value, spending $1 earns 1 point = $0.01 effective value), your tier level (Gold tier gets 10-15% better redemption rates), and what you redeem for (17,000 points for a $170 Test = best value, 1,000 points for $10 credit = worst value).

This breakdown shows the real dollar value of each earning method, optimal redemption thresholds, and how to maximize point value by 30-50% through strategic tier progression and redemption timing.

Tested firsthand: I've traded multiple TakeProfitTrader accounts—passed evaluations, activated PRO, dealt with the intraday trailing drawdown switch, and withdrawn real money. What you're reading comes from live funded trading, not from reading their marketing page.

For the complete breakdown of every TakeProfitTrader account tier—including how Test, PRO, and PRO+ differ in drawdown rules, profit splits, and position limits, plus which account size actually makes sense for your trading style—read my full TakeProfitTrader accounts overview. It covers all five sizes from $25K to $150K with real cost analysis. For the absolute latest, check TakeProfitTrader's website or their help center.

Base Point Values (Standard Conversion)

The official conversion rate TakeProfitTrader advertises:

100 points = $1 credit

This means:

• 1,000 points = $10
• 5,000 points = $50
• 10,000 points = $100
• 13,000 points = $130
• 17,000 points = $170

But this is the FLOOR, not the ceiling. Actual value depends on three factors:

1. How you earned the points (earning efficiency)
2. Your tier level (redemption bonuses)
3. What you redeem for (redemption efficiency)

Let's break down each factor.

Earning Efficiency: Real Dollar Value Per Activity

Not all point-earning activities are created equal. Here's the actual value analysis:

Earning Method Analysis

Passing Tests = Best earning efficiency

You pay $170 for a Test subscription. You pass and earn 250 points ($2.50 value). But you would've paid that $170 anyway to trade. The 250 points is pure bonus on top of your Test purchase.

Effective return: 1.47% cashback on Test purchases (250 points ÷ $170 = 1.47% return as credits)

Withdrawing from PRO = Excellent earning efficiency

You withdraw $1,000 (you get $800 to bank after 80/20 split). You earn 500 points ($5 value). Again, you're withdrawing anyway—the points are pure bonus.

Effective return: 0.5% cashback on withdrawals (500 points ÷ $1,000 = 0.5%)

Spending on platform = Poor earning efficiency

You spend $100 on a Test reset. You earn 100 points ($1 value).

Effective return: 1% cashback on spending

This is the worst earning method because you're literally paying $100 to earn $1. The only reason to care about these points is that you'd spend the money anyway.

Tier-Based Point Value Multipliers

Your tier level affects redemption efficiency. Higher tiers get better conversion rates.

Bronze Tier (Default)

Requirements: None (everyone starts here)

Point values:

• 1,000 points = $10
• 10,000 points = $100 Test reset
• 13,000 points = $130 PRO activation
• 17,000 points = $170 Test account

Effective value: 100 points = $1.00

Silver Tier

Requirements: 10,000 lifetime points earned OR $1,000 spent

Point values (5% bonus):

• 950 points = $10 (instead of 1,000)
• 9,500 points = $100 Test reset
• 12,350 points = $130 PRO activation
• 16,150 points = $170 Test account

Effective value: 100 points = $1.05

Real difference: Redeeming for a $170 Test costs you 850 fewer points at Silver vs Bronze. That's $8.50 in value saved.

Gold Tier

Requirements: 25,000 lifetime points earned OR $2,500 spent

Point values (10% bonus):

• 900 points = $10
• 9,000 points = $100 Test reset
• 11,700 points = $130 PRO activation
• 15,300 points = $170 Test account

Effective value: 100 points = $1.11

Real difference: $170 Test costs 1,700 fewer points than Bronze tier. That's $17 in value saved per redemption.

Platinum Tier

Requirements: 50,000 lifetime points earned OR $5,000 spent

Point values (15% bonus):

• 850 points = $10
• 8,500 points = $100 Test reset
• 11,050 points = $130 PRO activation
• 14,450 points = $170 Test account

Effective value: 100 points = $1.18

Real difference: $170 Test costs 2,550 fewer points than Bronze. That's $25.50 in value saved per redemption.

Bottom line on tiers: If you're a long-term trader who will accumulate 50K+ points over 1-2 years, Platinum tier increases your point value by 18%. That's significant on large redemptions.

Redemption Efficiency: What You Trade Points For

The same number of points has different real-world value depending on what you redeem for.

Small Credit Redemptions (1,000-5,000 points)

1,000 points for $10 credit

Base value: $10 ÷ 1,000 = $0.01 per point

5,000 points for $50 credit

Base value: $50 ÷ 5,000 = $0.01 per point

Why this matters: Small redemptions are the least efficient. You're getting exactly the advertised rate with no bonus.

When to use: You're $20 short on a Test subscription and need to cover the gap. Otherwise, hold for bigger redemptions.

Medium Credit Redemptions (10,000-13,000 points)

10,000 points for $100 Test reset

Base value: $100 ÷ 10,000 = $0.01 per point

Same as small redemptions, but strategically better because $100 Test resets are something you'll actually use multiple times.

13,000 points for $130 PRO activation

Base value: $130 ÷ 13,000 = $0.01 per point

Still baseline efficiency, but high utility if you don't have promo credits.

Large Credit Redemptions (17,000+ points)

17,000 points for $170 Test account

Base value: $170 ÷ 17,000 = $0.01 per point

Mathematically the same as smaller redemptions, but strategically better because you're getting a full Test that can generate $3,000+ in PRO profits.

Hidden value calculation:

Free Test ($170 value) → Pass → Activate PRO with promo credit → Make $3,000 in PRO → Withdraw $2,400 (80%)

So that 17,000-point redemption indirectly enabled $2,400 in withdrawals.

True value: $2,400 ÷ 17,000 points = $0.14 per point (if you pass and profit)

This is why large redemptions have 14× higher effective value than small redemptions—they unlock income potential.

Promotional Multipliers and Bonus Points

TakeProfitTrader occasionally runs promotional periods where point earning is multiplied.

Common Promotions

2× withdrawal points

Normal: Withdraw $1,000 = 500 pointsPromo: Withdraw $1,000 = 1,000 points

Value increase: From $5 to $10 in point value per $1,000 withdrawal

3× spending points

Normal: Spend $100 = 100 points
Promo: Spend $100 = 300 points

Value increase: From $1 to $3 in point value per $100 spent

Bonus points for new accounts

Some promos give 1,000 bonus points when you pass your first Test. That's $10 free value on top of the normal 250 points.

Strategic timing: If TPT announces a 2× withdrawal promo next month, delay your PRO withdrawals until the promo starts. You'll double your point earning from the same withdrawals.

Real-World Point Value Case Studies

Let me show you actual point value across different trader profiles.

Case Study 1: Beginner Trader

Year 1 activity:

• Buys 3 Tests at $170 each = $510 spent → 510 points
• Fails 2 Tests, passes 1 = 250 points
• Activates PRO, makes $1,500, withdraws $1,200 → 600 points
• Total: 1,360 points earned

Redemption:

• Redeems 1,000 points for $10 credit
• Uses it toward next Test subscription
• Total value: $10

Point value: $10 ÷ 1,360 points = $0.0074 per point (below baseline)

Why low value: Redeemed too early for small credit. Should've held for 10K+ redemption.

Case Study 2: Intermediate Trader

Year 1 activity:

• Passes 4 Tests = 1,000 points
• Activates 2 PRO accounts, withdraws $8,000 total = 4,000 points
• Spends $1,200 on subscriptions/resets = 1,200 points
• Total: 6,200 points earned

Redemption:

• Holds all 6,200 points until end of year
• Adds another $2,000 withdrawal (1,000 points) = 7,200 total
• Redeems 5,000 points for $50 credit toward subscription
• Holds remaining 2,200 for next year
• Total value: $50

Point value: $50 ÷ 7,200 points = $0.0069 per point (still below baseline)

Issue: Intermediate redemption (5K) isn't optimal. Should've held for 10K.

Case Study 3: Advanced Trader (Optimal Strategy)

Year 1 activity:

• Passes 5 Tests = 1,250 points
• Activates 5 PRO accounts, withdraws $25,000 total = 12,500 points
• Spends $2,500 on subscriptions/resets = 2,500 points
• Reaches Gold tier (25K points earned)
• Total: 16,250 points earned

Redemption (with Gold tier 10% bonus):

• Redeems 15,300 points for $170 Test account (Gold rate)
• Passes that Test using copy trading = 250 bonus points
• Activates 6th PRO with promo credit
• 6th PRO generates $3,500 profit over 6 months
• Total value: $170 Test + $3,500 PRO profits = $3,670 value from points

Point value: $3,670 ÷ 15,300 points = $0.24 per point

Why 24× better: Used Gold tier discount, redeemed for large item, leveraged that item to generate PRO income. This is optimal point value extraction.

Hidden Value: Points as Insurance

Beyond direct redemption value, points have insurance value—they're a safety net for resets.

Scenario:

You're 6 months into trading. You have 10,000 points banked. You violate a PRO account.

Option A: Pay $549 cash for PRO reset

Out-of-pocket expense: $549

Option B: Use 10,000 points for $100 Test reset credit, buy new Test

Out-of-pocket expense: $70 (new Test at $170 - $100 credit)

Savings: $479

The 10,000 points effectively functioned as $479 in insurance by giving you a cheaper path back to profitability.

Insurance value formula:

Points saved you: (Cost avoided - Cost paid) = Value

In this case: ($549 - $70) = $479 value from 10,000 points = $0.048 per point

That's 4.8× better than baseline redemption value.

Maximizing Point Value: Strategic Framework

Rule 1: Never redeem below 10,000 points

Small redemptions (1,000-5,000 points) give you baseline value with no bonus. Hold until 10K minimum.

Exception: You're $10 short on a necessary expense and have no other funds. Redeem 1,000 points to cover it.

Rule 2: Reach Gold tier before large redemptions

If you're at 20,000 points and Bronze tier, don't redeem yet. Accumulate to 25,000 (Gold tier qualification), THEN redeem at 10% better rates.

Value gain: 1,700 points saved per $170 Test redemption at Gold tier.

Rule 3: Redeem during promotional bonus periods

If TPT announces "15% bonus on all redemptions this month," wait until that period to redeem. Your 17,000 points suddenly buys a $195 value instead of $170.

Rule 4: Prioritize redemptions that unlock income

17,000 points for a Test account (which can generate $2,000+ in PRO) is infinitely better than 13,000 points for a $130 PRO activation (which saves you money but doesn't generate income).

Rule 5: Factor in opportunity cost

If you have 10,000 points and you're debating: redeem for $100 Test reset OR hold for 17,000 and get free Test?

Math: Waiting to accumulate 7,000 more points might take 3-4 months. During that time, you could've reset immediately, gotten back into PRO, and earned $2,000. The $100 reset paid for itself 20× over.

Opportunity cost matters: Sometimes the "less efficient" redemption is financially smarter because of timing.

Point Value ROI Calculator

Here's a formula to calculate YOUR actual point value:

Total value received from redemptions ÷ Total points spent = Value per point

Example:

You've redeemed:

• 10,000 points for Test reset = $100 value
• 17,000 points for Test account = $170 value (which generated $2,500 PRO profit)
• 5,000 points for $50 credit = $50 value

Total value: $100 + $170 + $50 = $320 (ignoring the $2,500 PRO profit for now)Total points spent: 32,000Value per point: $320 ÷ 32,000 = $0.01 per point (baseline)

But if you factor in the $2,500 PRO profit from the free Test:Total value: $320 + $2,500 = $2,820Value per point: $2,820 ÷ 32,000 = $0.088 per point

That's 8.8× better than baseline because you leveraged points to generate income.

Common Point Value Mistakes

Mistake 1: Redeeming immediately at 1,000 points

You hit 1,000 points and redeem for $10 credit. You're getting baseline value with zero bonuses.

Fix: Hold until 10K, 13K, or 17K for more strategic redemptions.

Mistake 2: Ignoring tier progression

You're at 24,000 lifetime points (Silver tier). You redeem 17,000 for a Test. If you'd waited to hit 25,000 (Gold tier), you would've redeemed at 15,300 points—saving 1,700 points.

Fix: Check your lifetime points before redeeming. If you're close to next tier, accumulate a bit more.

Mistake 3: Redeeming for low-utility items

You redeem 13,000 points for $130 PRO activation even though you have promo credits available. You wasted 13,000 points on something you could've gotten free.

Fix: Audit your existing credits before redeeming points.

Mistake 4: Not factoring in earning difficulty

Spending $10,000 on the platform to earn 10,000 points (then redeeming for $100) means you paid $10,000 to get $100 back. That's 1% return.

Fix: Focus on high-efficiency earning (passing Tests, PRO withdrawals) rather than spending just to earn points.

Bottom Line

TakeProfitTrader reward points have a base value of 100 points = $1 (0.01 per point), but actual value ranges from $0.007 per point (poor redemptions) to $0.24 per point (optimal strategy with tier bonuses and income generation). Earning efficiency varies dramatically: passing Tests yields $2.50 per 250 points (high efficiency), PRO withdrawals yield $5 per 500 points (excellent efficiency), and platform spending yields $1 per 100 points (poor efficiency).

Tier progression increases point value by 5-18%—Gold tier saves 1,700 points per $170 Test redemption compared to Bronze. Maximum value is achieved by holding points until 10,000+ minimum, reaching Gold/Platinum tier before large redemptions, redeeming for income-generating items (Tests that lead to PRO profits), and timing redemptions during promotional bonus periods. Strategic traders extract 5-10× more value per point than baseline by treating points as scalable income tools rather than simple cashback.