πŸ’° Maximum Discount Guaranteed!

Click "Use Code VIBES" and automatically save up to $228 per account. The code is applied instantly – no manual entry needed!

MyFundedFutures $100K Account: Full Breakdown (Rapid and Pro)

Paul from PropTradingVibes
Written by Paul
Published on
March 9, 2026
MyFunded Futures
MyFunded Futures
MyFunded Futures
20%
OFF
Current Promo:
20%
OFF
Best Code:
RAPID

Table of contents

The MyFundedFutures $100K account is available on two plans as of March 2026: Rapid at $229/month and Pro at $329/month. Core does not offer a $100K option β€” that account size is capped at $50K. If $100K notional capital is your target, you're choosing between Rapid and Pro, and the choice matters because their drawdown models are fundamentally different.

Here's everything you need to know.

Paul from PropTradingVibes

Tested firsthand: I've been running MFFU accounts since late 2023 across their old Starter/Expert structure and now the current Core, Rapid, and Pro plans. More than $20K withdrawn, 15-20 evals passed. I know which plan structure fits which type of trader β€” because I've traded them, not just read about them.

If you're trying to decide between Core, Rapid, and Pro β€” or just need the full account comparison with pricing tables for every size β€” my complete MFFU account types breakdown covers every plan side by side. For the absolute latest pricing, check MyFundedFutures' website or their help center.

$100K Account: What You're Getting

A $100K MyFundedFutures account gives you $100,000 in notional simulated trading capital on CME Group futures. The 6% profit target applies: you need to earn $6,000 during the evaluation phase to qualify for funded status.

The contract limits are higher than $50K. More notional capital means you can trade larger contract counts, which increases both your potential earnings per session and your risk per adverse tick.

No activation fee on either plan as of March 2026.

As of March 2026, one-time evaluation fee options also exist:

  • Rapid $100K one-time: $267
  • Pro $100K one-time: $829

The monthly subscription model makes more sense for most traders who expect to pass within a few months. The one-time fee makes sense if you're confident you'll pass quickly and don't want recurring charges.

Rapid $100K vs Pro $100K: The Key Differences

Feature Rapid $100K Pro $100K Winner
Monthly cost $229 $329 πŸ† Rapid
Drawdown type 4% intraday trailing 3% EOD trailing Depends on style
Drawdown buffer ($) $4,000 intraday $3,000 EOD Context-dependent
Profit target (eval) $6,000 $6,000 Tie
Profit split 90/10 80/20 πŸ† Rapid
Funded consistency rule None None Tie
Payout cadence Every 5 winning days Every 14 calendar days Depends on style
Per-cycle cap $11,250 None πŸ† Pro
Min withdrawal $250 $1,000 πŸ† Rapid
Scaling requirement Yes (micro-contract) None πŸ† Pro

Understanding the Drawdown Difference at $100K

This is where the choice between Rapid $100K and Pro $100K becomes genuinely important.

Rapid $100K uses a 4% intraday trailing drawdown with a $4,000 buffer. The floor moves in real time as your equity rises β€” not just at end of day, but tick by tick during open positions. If you enter a long on ES and your unrealized P&L climbs $2,000, your drawdown floor has moved up $2,000. A reversal back to breakeven on that trade means you've consumed $2,000 of your $4,000 buffer.

Pro $100K uses a 3% EOD trailing drawdown with a $3,000 buffer. The floor only moves at market close, based on your end-of-day equity. Open positions during the session don't affect the floor until they close and you end the day with a higher balance than before.

The dollar buffer on Rapid ($4,000) is larger in absolute terms than Pro ($3,000). But the intraday mechanic on Rapid makes that larger buffer more fragile in practice. A session where you run a position into profit and then watch it reverse can consume $3,000-$4,000 of Rapid buffer even without a net losing day.

Pro's $3,000 buffer is smaller on paper, but because it only moves at end-of-day, you can absorb significant intraday drawdowns without permanently compressing your floor β€” as long as you recover by close.

Neither model is objectively better. Which one fits you depends on whether you hold through intraday swings (favor EOD) or whether you close positions cleanly without large reversals (intraday is workable).

The $6,000 Profit Target: What That Looks Like in Practice

$6,000 on a $100K account is the same 6% as the $50K plan's $3,000 target. The percentage is identical. The dollar amount is double.

For a trader averaging $500/session, that's 12 winning sessions to hit target. For a trader averaging $1,000/session, six sessions.

The key consideration is that your drawdown buffer is proportionally the same but larger in dollar terms: $4,000 on Rapid intraday, $3,000 on Pro EOD. You have more room to absorb bad sessions before account termination β€” but you also have a higher hurdle to clear before you're funded.

Some traders do better on $100K because the larger contract limits allow them to run their actual trading strategy at full size, rather than being constrained by micro-contract limits on a $50K account. If your natural position sizing calls for 3-5 contracts of ES, a $50K account may be too small. $100K gives you the room to trade your system properly.

How $100K Pricing Compares Across Plans

Plan / Size Monthly One-Time Drawdown Buffer Split
Rapid $50K $129 $157 $2,000 intraday 90/10
Rapid $100K $229 $267 $4,000 intraday 90/10
Pro $50K $229 $629 $1,500 EOD 80/20
Pro $100K $329 $829 $3,000 EOD 80/20

Note: the Rapid $100K at $229/month costs the same as the Pro $50K at $229/month. That's an interesting choice point β€” same price, intraday vs EOD drawdown, 90/10 vs 80/20, $100K vs $50K. The right pick depends entirely on which drawdown model suits your trading style.

When Does Stepping Up to $100K Make Sense?

The case for $100K over $50K is straightforward in theory: double the capital, same percentage rules, larger absolute dollar earning potential per trade.

In practice, stepping up makes sense when:

Your position sizing at $50K is constrained. If you're regularly bumping against contract limits on a $50K account, the $100K account lets you trade your actual strategy rather than a reduced version of it. This is the most legitimate reason to step up.

You've demonstrated profitability on $50K. Passing evaluations is one signal, but funded-phase performance matters more. If you're consistently pulling $2,000-$3,000 cycles on a $50K funded account, $100K doubles your earning potential with the same percentage risk.

You can absorb the higher absolute dollar drawdown risk. The $3,000-$4,000 drawdown buffer on a $100K account is larger in dollar terms than the $1,500-$2,000 buffer on $50K. You need to be comfortable with the idea that a bad week could cost you twice the dollar amount of a $50K account breach.

The monthly cost difference fits your budget. $229 vs $329/month on Pro, or $129 vs $229/month on Rapid. The step-up costs $100/month. If your $50K funded account earns $2,500/month at 80/20, your net is $2,000 after the subscription. A $100K account with similar proportional performance earns $4,000 before fees, $3,671 after β€” $1,671 more net per month for $100 more per month in subscription cost.

That math is compelling. But only when the underlying performance is consistent. A $100K account losing a funded run is twice as expensive in terms of time-to-qualification as a $50K account, even if the dollar subscription cost increase is modest.

My Experience on Pro $100K

I moved to Pro $100K accounts after running three months on Pro $50K without triggering the funded phase consistency issues I'd worried about. The transition was smooth β€” same evaluation structure, same EOD drawdown mechanics, just a larger profit target and proportionally larger buffer.

The difference I noticed immediately: contract sizing. On $50K, I was trading 2-3 contracts of ES. At $100K, I could run 4-5 contracts without bumping any limits. That's not a minor thing β€” it meant my average winning session scaled up closer to what my system is actually designed to produce.

Payout cycles on Pro $100K at 80/20 with the $3,000 EOD buffer have been workable. The 14-calendar-day schedule suits my planning rhythm better than counting winning days.

The $100K cumulative payout cap on Pro is on my radar. At current withdrawal paces, I'll hit it within 12-18 months across my accounts and transition to MFFU's live trading stage. That's the plan.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the MyFundedFutures $100K account available on Core?

No. MyFundedFutures Core is only available at $50K. The $100K account size is available on Rapid ($229/month) and Pro ($329/month) only. If you want a $100K account at MFFU, you must choose between Rapid and Pro.

What is the profit target on the MFFU $100K account?

The MyFundedFutures $100K account requires a $6,000 profit target during the evaluation phase, which is 6% of the $100K notional balance. This is the same percentage as all other MFFU account sizes.

What is the drawdown buffer on the MFFU $100K Rapid account?

The MyFundedFutures Rapid $100K account has a $4,000 intraday trailing drawdown buffer (4% of $100K). This buffer moves in real time during open positions β€” not just at end of day. If your equity rises $2,000 on an open trade, your drawdown floor has already moved up by $2,000.

What is the drawdown buffer on the MFFU $100K Pro account?

The MyFundedFutures Pro $100K account has a $3,000 EOD trailing drawdown buffer (3% of $100K). The floor only adjusts at market close based on your end-of-day equity. Intraday unrealized gains and losses do not move the drawdown floor during the session.

How much does the MFFU $100K account cost?

As of March 2026, MyFundedFutures charges $229/month for Rapid $100K and $329/month for Pro $100K. One-time options are $267 (Rapid) and $829 (Pro). The code UNCAPPED gives 50% off new Pro subscriptions, bringing Pro $100K monthly to $164.50.

Can I have multiple MFFU $100K accounts?

Yes. MyFundedFutures allows up to 3 funded $100K or $150K accounts simultaneously. You can run multiple $100K accounts across Rapid and Pro, but the $100K cumulative payout cap on Pro applies across all Pro accounts combined.

Is the $100K MFFU account better than two $50K accounts?

A single MyFundedFutures $100K account and two $50K accounts have the same total notional capital, but the $100K gives you a single larger drawdown buffer ($3K-$4K) vs two separate $1.5K-$2K buffers. Two $50K accounts have independent drawdown clocks β€” one can breach without affecting the other. A single $100K account has more capital but single-point-of-failure risk in its drawdown.

Does MyFundedFutures $100K have a consistency rule?

MyFundedFutures Rapid $100K has no consistency rule in the funded phase. Pro $100K also has no funded consistency rule. Only Core β€” which is $50K only β€” has a 40% funded consistency rule. The $100K size is available only on plans without funded-phase consistency restrictions.

What happens when I pass the MFFU $100K evaluation?

After passing the MyFundedFutures $100K evaluation, your account transitions to funded (simulated live) status on the same plan (Rapid or Pro). You trade the same drawdown rules, same contract limits, and the same plan-specific funded-phase structure. For Pro, the $100K cumulative payout cap begins tracking from your first withdrawal.

Should I start at $100K or build up from $50K?

Starting on a MyFundedFutures $50K account and building to $100K after demonstrating funded profitability is the more conservative approach. The $100K profit target requires $6,000 to clear vs $3,000 on $50K. Unless your position sizing genuinely requires $100K-level contract limits to run your strategy effectively, the $50K account proves your system at lower evaluation cost before you commit to the higher target.