Table of contents
Running one funded account is good. Running three at the same time is where the math gets interesting.
This article covers exactly how many Lucid accounts you can run, what the limits look like for each account type, what multi-account setups actually cost, and where most traders mess things up. I'll walk through my own numbers and explain why I chose this specific combination over other options.
Learned the hard way: I've breached Lucid Trading accounts, passed Lucid Trading accounts, and spent the time since the firm launched figuring out which rules trip traders versus which ones are manageable. This reflects trial-and-error experience, including my mistakes.
For a full breakdown of every rule across all account types, check my complete Lucid Trading review. Related deep dives: payout rules, max drawdown explained, consistency rule. For the absolute latest, check Lucid Trading's website or their help center.
How Many Accounts Can You Run at Lucid Trading?
The short answer: it depends on which account types you're using and whether the accounts are in evaluation or funded status.
Lucid splits their limits into three buckets:
Evaluation accounts are capped at 10 per household or family. That includes any combination of LucidPro evaluations, LucidFlex or LucidDaily evaluations, or LucidDirect accounts still in their evaluation phase. Ten is generous. Most traders never need that many evals going at once.
Funded accounts max out at 5 per household. Once you've passed evaluations and hold funded status, you can have five active funded accounts simultaneously. Five 150K accounts work out to $750,000 of combined allocation, which is simply what the size ceiling produces rather than a separately published dollar cap.
LucidLive does not work like a third bucket you stack on top. You do not buy or collect live accounts. When Lucid moves you live, you receive one live account for every eligible funded account, and each of those funded accounts needs at least one payout to qualify. Funded accounts with zero payouts get closed and the evaluation fee refunded, and every remaining simulated account closes on the same move. The live side has its own household ceiling of 5 active LucidLive accounts, which is the same number as the funded cap it replaces.
One thing people get wrong: the evaluation and funded limits are not additive. Lucid's help center caps you at 10 accounts in total across evaluations and funded accounts combined. Hold 5 funded and you may keep 5 evaluations in reserve, and those reserve evaluations can still be traded. Fifteen simulated accounts under one roof is not a thing. Live is the one thing that does not add to the pile, because the move to live closes your simulated accounts.
What are the account limits for Flex, Pro, Daily, Direct and Maxx?
Each Lucid account type comes with different rules for how many you can stack. Here's the full breakdown as of July 2026:
| Account Type | Max Accounts (Funded) | Max Allocation | DLL | Consistency Rule | Payout Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LucidFlex | 5 (within total funded cap) | $750K combined | None | 0% funded | Standard |
| LucidPro | 5 (within total funded cap) | $750K combined | $1,200 to $2,700 by size, none at 25K | 40% funded (35% on accounts bought or reset before 11/28/2025) | 3-day payouts (per Lucid's pricing page) |
| LucidDaily | 5 (within total funded cap) | $750K combined | Optional (checkout choice, soft breach) | None funded (50% eval) | Daily payout requests |
| LucidDirect | 5 (within total funded cap) | $750K combined | $1,200 to $3,000 by size, none at 25K, soft breach | 20% per payout cycle | Standard |
| LucidMaxx | Up to 5 (own allowance, granted status) | $25K to $150K sizes | None | None live (40% in the evaluation) | Daily uncapped payouts |
| LucidLive | One per eligible funded account | Starts at $0, drawdown mirrors the funded size | None | None | Daily payouts |
A few things to notice here.
LucidMaxx status is not something you buy. It is a status the Lucid risk team grants to selected traders, and it unlocks the right to purchase the LucidMaxx evaluation, which then carries daily uncapped payouts plus instant live capital. The rule sheet is published: up to 5 simultaneous accounts, no daily loss limit, EOD drawdown, 90/10 from the first payout, no live-account profit minimums, a 40% consistency rule and 5 trading days inside the evaluation, and a 2-week cooldown after a blown live account.
LucidFlex still has 0% funded consistency, meaning your best day's profit doesn't need to stay under any percentage threshold. That makes Flex the easiest account type to run aggressively on a single big trading day.
LucidPro runs a 40% consistency rule on the funded side and carries a daily loss limit ($1,200 at 50K, none at 25K). Accounts purchased or reset before November 28, 2025 at 3:00 PM ET keep the older 35% threshold instead; Lucid's help center documents both numbers side by side. The profit split is 90/10 (accounts opened before November 28, 2025 kept 100% of the first $10K). The DLL adds a layer of protection against blowing up, but it also limits how much you can lose on any single session. Pro payouts carry a third gate that is easy to miss in a multi-account setup: profit has to sit above the buffer balance, which is the starting balance plus the initial Max Loss Limit plus $100 ($26,100 at 25K, $52,100 at 50K, $103,100 at 100K, $154,600 at 150K). Every account you run builds its own buffer before it pays anything.
LucidDirect has a 20% consistency rule per payout cycle and a soft-breach DLL. "Soft-breach" means hitting the daily loss limit doesn't immediately kill your account, but it does lock you out for the rest of the session. Direct payouts also run against a profit goal per cycle, reset to $0 after each approved payout: $1,500 at 25K, $3,000 at 50K, $6,000 at 100K and $9,000 at 150K for the first goal, then $1,250, $2,500, $3,500 and $4,500 for every goal after it. Direct is sold in those four sizes, and the 25K account rules break down the entry tier in detail.
LucidDaily is the newest publicly purchasable type, added to the lineup in July 2026. It pairs daily payout requests ($500 minimum, no per-request cap) with an optional DLL you pick at checkout and no consistency rule in funded, while the funded drawdown trails intraday. The full rule set is in the LucidDaily account breakdown.
One important note: LucidBlack is no longer sold and survives only as a legacy collection in the help center, so any reference to it in older content is history rather than an option you can pick today.
Why run multiple Lucid accounts?
The case for running more than one account comes down to three things: income math, risk isolation, and drawdown independence.
Income math
One 50K account releasing $2,000 a request is sitting at the Flex cap. Three of them at that pace is $6,000, and the strategies and effort do not triple. If you copy the same signals across accounts, the work stays almost the same while the payouts scale with the account count. What does not scale is runway: each account still stops at five payouts, so a bigger book buys you more payouts running in parallel, not more payouts per account.
Risk isolation
If one account blows, the others keep printing. Picture a rough FOMC session on the Pro account: down hard, close to the DLL, while the Flex accounts are fine because profits were already taken earlier that day and trading stopped on those.
With a single account, one bad week could erase your entire income stream. With three accounts, you'd need to blow all three simultaneously. Possible, but much less likely if you manage them with even a little bit of discipline.
Drawdown independence
Each account has its own trailing drawdown, its own starting balance, and its own rules. A drawdown that gets tight on Account A doesn't affect Account B or C at all. This sounds obvious, but the psychological impact is massive. When one account's drawdown is close, you can trade conservatively on that one while being more aggressive on accounts with more room.
Multi-Account Strategies: Same Type vs. Mixed Types
There are basically two schools of thought here, and I've tried both.
Same type, same size
Running three identical accounts (say, 3x Flex 50K) makes management dead simple. Same rules across the board, same drawdown mechanics, same payout process. You copy the same trade to all three and manage them as a single unit.
The advantage is simplicity. You never mix up which account allows what. You never accidentally violate a DLL on one account because you forgot it was a Pro and not a Flex.
The downside: if your strategy isn't compatible with one account type's rules, you're exposed on all three.
Mixed types, same or different sizes
This is what I do. Two Flex 50K + one Pro 50K. Here's why.
Flex lets you choose DLL ON or DLL OFF at checkout. That means on high-volatility days like CPI or NFP there is no separate daily loss cap to trip. What does not go away is the Max Loss Limit: it trails at end of day, but the breach fires the moment the balance reaches it, so an intraday drawdown that touches the MLL ends the account whether or not the trade comes back by the close. The extra room on Flex is room below a daily cap, not room below the MLL.
Pro has a DLL but also runs 3-day payout cycles, so I trade that account more conservatively with tighter stops and get faster access to profits on it. The 100% split on the first $10K is grandfathered for accounts bought or reset before November 28, 2025; everything since then is 90/10.
The combo gives me different risk profiles across accounts that I can dial up or down depending on the market day.
Different sizes
Some traders run a mix like 1x 100K + 2x 50K. The idea is concentrating capital on the larger account while using the smaller ones for riskier setups. I haven't done this because I like keeping all accounts the same size for simplicity. Same position sizing rules, same dollar-risk per trade, same everything. But I can see the appeal if you've got a higher-conviction core strategy and a secondary experimental approach.
My 3-Account Setup: 2 Flex 50K + 1 Pro 50K
Let me break down exactly what this looks like in practice.
The accounts
- LucidFlex 50K #1: the workhorse. No daily loss limit and no funded consistency rule, so it carries most of the size on volatile sessions.
- LucidFlex 50K #2: same rules as the first one, opened later and still ramping toward full size.
- LucidPro 50K: the conservative anchor. The DLL and the 40% funded consistency rule keep risk tight, and the 3-day payout cycle listed on Lucid's pricing page pulls profit out faster. The help center itself documents no cycle length for Pro, only the Minimum Profit Goal of $250 to $1,000 per cycle by size.
Why this combo
The two Flex accounts are my bread and butter. No DLL means I can trade through volatile opens without watching a daily loss number tick down. I don't need to worry about consistency rules either since Flex is 0% funded consistency. I can have one massive green day and request a payout.
The Pro account is my conservative anchor. The per-cycle consistency rule keeps me disciplined there. The DLL forces tighter stops. The split there is 90/10 like everywhere else at Lucid today; the old 100% on the first $10K only survives on accounts bought or reset before November 28, 2025.
Monthly costs
The ongoing cost of this setup is zero. Lucid doesn't charge monthly subscription fees on any account type. The only costs are the one-time evaluation fees per account; for current per-size pricing see the Lucid Trading review. My mix:
- Two LucidFlex 50K evaluations
- One LucidPro 50K evaluation
Across 30+ payout cycles, spread over several LucidFlex and LucidPro account generations rather than three accounts running forever, the evaluation cost paid for itself many times over. Even after a few failed evals along the way, the ROI on the entry fees was massive.
Cost Analysis for Popular Multi-Account Combos
If you're planning a multi-account setup, you can model the upfront cost from the current per-account pricing in the Lucid Trading review. Five common configurations:
| Setup | Accounts | Total Allocation | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Budget Starter | 3x Flex 25K | $75,000 | Low-budget scaling |
| My Setup | 2x Flex 50K + 1x Pro 50K | $150,000 | Mixed risk profiles |
| All-Flex Mid | 3x Flex 50K | $150,000 | Maximum flexibility, no DLL |
| Aggressive Scale | 2x Pro 100K + 1x Flex 50K | $250,000 | Higher allocation, fast Pro payouts |
| Max Allocation | 5x Pro 150K | $750,000 | Maximum capital under one roof |
For current evaluation costs across each account size and product, see the Lucid Trading review.
The LucidDirect option is interesting if you don't want to bother with evaluations. Direct gets you funded immediately with no eval phase. But Direct has a 20% consistency rule and soft-breach DLL, which adds friction. For multi-account setups, I'd rather run a Pro eval at a similar fee, pass it once, and have better terms on the funded side. Current Direct vs Pro pricing lives in the Lucid Trading review.
LucidMaxx is the one Lucid product whose price the help center does publish, because the evaluation is bought once the status is granted: $110 to $175 (25K), $180 to $290 (50K), $270 to $430 (100K) and $425 to $680 (150K), with the tier set by how many live accounts you have blown without clearing drawdown. No discount code applies, VIBES included, and a reset costs the same as the first attempt.
Managing Multiple Accounts Day to Day
Running three accounts isn't three times the work. But it's not zero extra effort either.
Platform setup
You can run all your Lucid accounts through Tradovate or NinjaTrader. Both platforms let you switch between accounts using a dropdown menu. The critical habit: always verify which account is active before placing any order. I've misclicked once and put a trade on the wrong account. It didn't blow anything up, but it could have if the position size was wrong for that account's drawdown level.
I keep each account on a separate workspace tab in Tradovate. Account #1 on the left monitor, #2 and #3 on the right. Visual separation helps avoid confusion.
Copy trading
Lucid explicitly allows bots, EAs, copy trading and API strategies on your own accounts, in evaluation and in funded, with no approval needed. You carry the risk if your software misfires. What stays banned is high-frequency trading and microscalping. Lucid does not endorse a particular copy tool, so pick one your platform supports.
I do a version of this manually. I place the trade on one account, then quickly replicate it on the other two. Takes about 10-15 seconds total. Not as clean as automated copy trading, but I like having manual control over each account's position.
If you're running 4-5 accounts, automated copy trading becomes almost necessary. Manual entry on five accounts while managing live positions is a recipe for mistakes.
Tracking and journaling
I use a spreadsheet to track each account separately. Columns: date, account name, entry/exit price, P&L, running balance, drawdown remaining. Takes five minutes after each session. You need this. Without individual tracking, you'll lose sight of which accounts are healthy and which are getting tight on drawdown.
Mental bandwidth
This is the part nobody talks about. Three accounts means three sets of drawdown numbers in your head, three different balances to protect, three payout requests to manage. It's not hard when things are going well. When one account is close to breach and the other two are printing, the mental separation gets tricky.
My rule: if any account's drawdown gets within 30% of breach, I stop trading that account for the rest of the week. No exceptions. Protect the asset. The other accounts keep generating income while the stressed account recovers through small, low-risk trades the following week.
Common Multi-Account Mistakes
I've seen these kill traders' multi-account setups. Some I've made myself.
Starting all accounts at once. If you launch five evals on the same day, you're paying for all five entry fees upfront before proving you can pass even one. Start with one or two. Pass them. Get a few payouts. Then add accounts. Current per-size entry fees are listed in the Lucid Trading review.
Ignoring the $750K allocation cap. Five 150K Pro accounts equal $750K, which is what the 5-account funded ceiling works out to at the largest size. The published rule is the account count, not the dollar figure, so plan around the count: 5 funded, 10 total across evaluations and funded, 5 live.
Running different strategies on each account. Some traders think multi-account means multi-strategy. One account for scalping, one for trend-following, one for news events. Sounds smart on paper. In practice, it means you're managing three completely different risk profiles, three different watchlists, and three different mental frameworks. Copy one proven edge across all accounts instead.
Forgetting which account has which rules. If you're mixing Flex and Pro, remember: Pro has a DLL, Flex doesn't. Trading a Flex strategy on a Pro account can violate the DLL before you realize it. I write the account type on a sticky note next to each monitor. Simple, but it works.
Maxing out evaluations too early. The 10-account ceiling exists, and it is shared with your funded accounts, but trying to pass 10 evaluations simultaneously is burning money. Your pass rate doesn't improve by running more evals. It improves by getting better at one eval first.
Not tracking accounts individually. A blended P&L across all accounts hides which ones are performing and which are dragging. One profitable account can mask two losing ones. Track each account like it's a separate business.
Path to LucidLive With Multiple Accounts
LucidLive is Lucid's real-capital account. You start at $0 and trade on a 90/10 split, with a one-time bonus of $1,000 to $4,500 by funded account size released as a payout once your live profits reach the live target for that size, which sits $100 above the starting live drawdown ($1,100 on a 25K, $2,100 on a 50K, $3,100 on a 100K, $4,600 on a 150K). Lucid's LucidFlex payout article words this as automatic: five payouts per account, after which the trader is moved live. Lucid's live-structure article words it differently: payout 5 is the maximum payout level rather than a guaranteed route, and every live transition happens at the discretion of the risk team. The two articles do not agree, so plan for a review after payout 5, not for a guaranteed live account. The risk team also pulls traders into that review early on lifetime payout volume or exceptional sim performance. LucidDaily is the exception on both counts: it uses a trigger-based review pool instead of a payout count, it pays no live bonus at all, and sim profits above the buffer are capped at $15,000 total no matter how many accounts you convert.
The question everyone asks: does each funded account qualify for LucidLive separately?
Yes, and most traders have this backwards. When Lucid moves you live, every eligible funded account converts at once: one live account per funded account, with at least one payout on each to qualify. Funded accounts sitting at zero payouts are closed and the evaluation fee refunded. Every remaining simulated account closes on the same move, so there is no sim book left running on the side.
The smart play: get at least one payout banked on every funded account you care about before a live trigger comes near. An account with zero payouts does not convert, it just closes with the evaluation fee refunded, which is a bad way to lose a seat you worked for.
After the LucidLive transition, you'll have:
- One live account for each funded account that banked at least one payout, each starting at $0 with EOD drawdown, no daily loss limit, no consistency rule and daily payouts
- No simulated accounts left. Anything that did not qualify is closed, and zero-payout funded accounts get the evaluation fee refunded
That is a clean cut, not a portfolio expansion. Live capital replaces the sim book instead of sitting next to it, which is exactly why you want every account to bank a payout before you get there.
What a Multi-Account Book Can Actually Pay Out
Multiplying a monthly figure by twelve is the wrong shape for this, because a simulated book has an end. Each account stops at payout 5, and the caps per request are fixed. So here is the ceiling instead: what a given setup can release across the whole life of its accounts, using 50K sizes since that is the most popular. Every row assumes each cycle carries enough profit to reach the cap, which is the optimistic end of the range, not the expected one.
| Setup | Per-account sim payout ceiling | Portfolio ceiling, gross | After the 90/10 split |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2x Flex 50K | $10,000 (5 requests, 50% of cycle profit up to $2,000) | $20,000 | $18,000 |
| 3x Flex 50K | $10,000 | $30,000 | $27,000 |
| 2x Flex 50K + 1x Pro 50K | $10,000 on Flex, $12,000 on Pro | $32,000 | $28,800 |
| 5x Pro 50K | $12,000 ($2,000 on payout 1, then $2,500) | $60,000 | $54,000 |
| 5x Direct 50K | $11,000 ($2,000 on payouts 1 to 3, then $2,500) | $55,000 | $49,500 |
| 5x Daily 50K | No per-request cap and no payout ladder | No fixed ceiling | 90/10 |
Those are ceilings, not forecasts. Hitting the Flex number means every one of the five cycles carries $4,000 of profit, because the request releases 50% of the cycle and stops at $2,000. Hitting the Pro number means clearing the $52,100 buffer on every cycle before the request is accepted. Most books do not run that clean.
There is no annual line in that table on purpose. Payout 5 puts each account into the live review pool, and when the move comes, every remaining simulated account closes and the live accounts start at $0. What the table shows is what the sim book can release before that reset, not a recurring income.
The multi-account structure still does the thing you want it to do: it smooths months out, because it is rare that every account has a bad one at the same time. It just does that inside a fixed number of payouts rather than forever.
Running three 50K accounts part-time with a bias toward capital preservation over maximum extraction puts you well below those ceilings, not at them.
The LucidMaxx Factor
LucidMaxx deserves special attention for multi-account traders. Here's why.
Maxx is built around scaling. Daily uncapped payouts mean you do not wait out a cycle or accumulate a minimum before withdrawing, and passing the evaluation puts you straight onto live capital. The limits are published: up to 5 simultaneous accounts, no daily loss limit, EOD drawdown and no profit minimums once live.
The catch: the status is granted, not sold. You cannot buy your way onto the Maxx track off the shelf. The risk team hands the status to traders who have already proven themselves on the standard plans, and only then does the evaluation become purchasable, at a fixed price with no discounts.
If you earn the status, uncapped daily payouts across several accounts is about as efficient as multi-account prop trading gets. The closest option you can actually buy is LucidDaily, which pairs daily payout requests and no per-request cap with an optional DLL, though its funded drawdown trails intraday and red folder news trading is a hard breach there, with the evaluation undocumented rather than exempt. For most traders, Daily or Flex is the realistic multi-account answer.
I don't have Maxx accounts yet. When I do, I'll update this article with real numbers.
Hedging Across Accounts: Don't Do It
One rule Lucid enforces strictly: no hedging across accounts. That means you can't go long ES on Account A and short ES on Account B at the same time, and the ban reaches further than the same contract. Minis against micros of the same contract in separate accounts is out. So are correlated assets, long ES in one account against short NQ in another, with the same logic applied to groupings in equities, metals and energies. Hedging between different users' accounts and between different firms or funded platforms is banned too.
The logic makes sense from their perspective. Hedging across accounts creates a guaranteed profit on one side and a guaranteed loss on the other. Lucid eats the loss on the breached account while you pocket the profit on the winning account. It's an exploit, not a strategy.
On the sim side, a first flagged offence brings an email notice and resets the affected accounts to the prior day's balance; repeated offences breach every account involved and can end your access permanently. Hedging live accounts is prohibited by both Lucid and the CME, and Lucid states that violations draw a permanent ban with no warning step. Inside one account you do have room: long and short on different contracts is fine, and so is long minis against short micros of the same contract.
The bottom line
The ceiling is a count, not a dollar figure: 10 accounts in total across evaluations and funded, at most 5 of them funded, and 5 LucidLive accounts on the other side of the move. One profile per trader, with no second sign-up around it. Build the book one account at a time, bank at least one payout on each before a live trigger arrives, run the same proven edge across all of them, and never hold opposing exposure on two accounts at once. What multiple accounts buy you is payouts running in parallel and a breach that only takes out one seat, not a higher ceiling per account.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many funded accounts can you have at Lucid Trading at the same time?
Lucid allows up to 5 funded accounts simultaneously per household, and no more than 10 accounts in total across evaluations and funded accounts. Five 150K accounts work out to $750,000 combined. The 5-account funded ceiling covers Flex, Pro, Daily and Direct together; LucidMaxx carries its own allowance of up to 5 simultaneous accounts, and no new Maxx evaluation may be purchased while an active Live account is open. One more household rule matters: if one member of your household is trading live, nobody else in that household may trade simulated accounts.
Can you run LucidFlex and LucidPro accounts together?
Yes. You can mix any combination of Lucid account types within the 5-account funded limit. I run 2 Flex and 1 Pro simultaneously. The different rule sets actually complement each other if you adjust your trading approach per account type.
Does each Lucid account qualify for LucidLive separately?
Every eligible funded account converts at the same time: one live account per funded account, each needing at least one payout to qualify. Flex, Pro and Direct all top out at 5 payouts per account, which is the point that puts you in the live review pool rather than an automatic unlock, and LucidDaily runs on a trigger-based review pool instead of a count. Funded accounts with zero payouts are closed with the evaluation fee refunded, and all remaining simulated accounts close on the same move.
What is the maximum capital allocation across all Lucid accounts?
The funded ceiling is 5 accounts, which works out to $750,000 combined at the largest size, and evaluations plus funded accounts share a single 10-account ceiling: 5 funded leaves room for 5 evaluations in reserve, not 10. Live allocation does not stack on top of that. Live accounts replace the funded ones, each starts at $0, and the starting live drawdown mirrors the funded account size it came from.
Can you copy trade across your own Lucid accounts?
Yes. Lucid explicitly permits bots, EAs, copy trading and API strategies on your own accounts in both evaluation and funded phases, without needing approval, and you stay responsible for what your software does. Lucid names no preferred tool. The hard limits are high-frequency trading, microscalping, and hedging across accounts, which covers the same contract, minis against micros, and correlated assets such as ES against NQ, plus hedging between users and across firms.
How much does a 3-account Lucid setup cost?
It depends on account types and sizes. There are no monthly fees on any Lucid account, so the only cost is the initial evaluation fee per account.
What happens if you breach one Lucid account but not the others?
Each account operates independently. Breaching one account has zero effect on your other funded accounts. Your drawdown, balance, and payout eligibility on the surviving accounts remain unchanged. This is one of the biggest advantages of running multiple accounts.
Is LucidMaxx better than LucidFlex for multiple accounts?
LucidMaxx offers daily uncapped payouts and instant live capital, which is strong for multi-account income extraction, but the status is earned rather than bought, and only then does its evaluation go on sale at a fixed, undiscountable price. Flex is cheap and publicly available, and LucidDaily adds daily payout requests with no per-request cap. For almost everyone, the real choice is between Flex and Daily.
Should beginners start with multiple Lucid accounts?
No. Pass one evaluation first. Get a few payouts. Confirm your strategy works on a funded account. Then add a second account. Jumping to 3-5 accounts before proving consistency on one is a fast way to burn through evaluation fees.
Can you run Lucid accounts alongside other prop firm accounts?
Yes. Lucid has no restrictions against holding funded accounts at other firms simultaneously. Many traders run Lucid alongside Topstep, TakeProfitTrader, or other firms. The only added complexity is managing more accounts, more rule sets, and more platforms.
Can I open a second Lucid profile?
No. Lucid's help center is explicit that a trader may only ever hold one Lucid Trading profile, personal or business. Profiles cannot be converted between the two, deactivated, or replaced to create a new one. Whatever you register first stays your permanent profile, which is why the household limits above are the real ceiling and not something a second sign-up gets around.
What happens to a Lucid account I stop trading?
It gets deleted. An account that goes 30 calendar days without a trade producing at least $1 of net profit or loss is deemed abandoned and permanently removed. Breached evaluations are cleared on the same 30-day schedule unless you reset them first. Running several accounts makes this easy to trip: the quiet third account is the one that disappears.
