Best Alternatives to FundingPips 2026: 6 Top Forex Prop Firms Tested

I've been trading FundingPips for 18 months and pulled around $13,000 in payouts across multiple accounts. It's my go-to forex prop firm. But here's the thing—no single firm works for every trader, and having alternatives isn't disloyalty. It's smart risk management.

Maybe FundingPips doesn't offer the platform you prefer. Maybe you want a 2-Step evaluation with lower profit targets. Maybe you're in a restricted country. Or maybe you just want to diversify across multiple firms the way I diversify across futures props.

I've tested all six of these firms personally—some extensively, others enough to form a solid opinion. This isn't a list pulled from affiliate rankings. It's based on real accounts, real trades, and real payouts (or real frustrations, where applicable).

Here are the six best FundingPips alternatives in 2026, what each one does differently, and who should consider switching—or running both.

How I compare firms: This comparison is built from actual accounts I've run with each firm—not from reading marketing pages or aggregating reviews. I've passed evals, traded funded, requested withdrawals, and dealt with support at both firms.

FundingPips has been one of my go-to forex prop firms for its flexible evaluation models and Tuesday Payday system. For the full breakdown of their account structure, pricing, rules, and what makes them different from other forex firms, check out my complete FundingPips review. It's based on multiple funded accounts and real withdrawals—including what works, what doesn't, and where they fall short. For the absolute latest, check FundingPips' website or their FAQ section.

Quick Comparison: FundingPips vs Top Alternatives

That's the snapshot. Now let me go deeper on each one.

1. FTMO – The Industry Standard

FTMO is the firm everyone knows. Czech-based, operating since 2015, and they've paid out hundreds of millions to traders. If FundingPips is the new school, FTMO is the institution.

Why traders choose FTMO over FundingPips:

The trust factor. FTMO has the longest track record in the industry, full stop. They've survived market cycles, regulatory scrutiny, and the prop firm boom without collapsing. For traders who prioritize stability over features, that matters.

Platform options are another edge. FTMO supports MT4, MT5, and cTrader. FundingPips is MT5 only. If you're a cTrader loyalist—and I get it, the interface is cleaner for some strategies—FTMO is your only realistic option among top-tier firms.

My take: FTMO is the "safe" choice. Higher cost, proven reliability. If you've never tried a prop firm and want the lowest-risk introduction to the industry, FTMO's reputation provides peace of mind. But you're paying a premium for it—both in eval fees and profit split. For experienced traders, FundingPips offers better value.

Best for: Risk-averse traders who value brand reputation and need MT4/cTrader support.

2. FundedNext – Closest Direct Competitor

FundedNext is probably the most similar to FundingPips in positioning—competitive pricing, multiple eval types, strong marketing presence. They've grown fast and built a decent reputation.

The pricing is nearly identical at the low end. Both start around $32 for their smallest accounts. Where they differ is in the details—profit split structure, scaling plans, and rule specifics.

FundedNext offers something I appreciate: they pay 15% of profits earned during the evaluation phase on their Express model. Not a huge amount on small accounts, but it's a nice touch that shows they're thinking about trader experience from day one.

My take: Solid alternative. If you want MT4 support that FundingPips doesn't offer, FundedNext fills that gap at a similar price point. The 15% eval profit share is a genuine differentiator. But I still prefer FundingPips' dashboard, payout consistency, and the path to 100% profit split.

Best for: Traders who want MT4 compatibility and appreciate earning during evaluation.

3. E8 Markets – Clean Rules, No Surprises

E8 Markets doesn't get as much hype as FTMO or FundedNext, but the traders who use it tend to stick with it. The appeal is simplicity—clear rules, straightforward evaluation, no gimmicks.

I've run a couple of E8 accounts. The experience was clean. Nothing blew me away, but nothing frustrated me either. Sometimes "boring and reliable" is exactly what you want from a prop firm.

Their rule structure is similar to FundingPips—drawdown limits, profit targets, consistency requirements. Where they differ is in the specifics. E8's drawdown is often slightly more conservative, which means you need tighter risk management during evaluation. Not necessarily a bad thing if you're already disciplined.

My take: E8 is the "quiet achiever." Less marketing noise, reliable execution. The 80% profit split is the main reason it sits below FundingPips for me—that's a significant difference over time. But if you value predictable rules and a no-drama trading environment, E8 deserves a look.

Best for: Disciplined traders who prioritize rule clarity over maximum profit split.

4. Alpha Capital Group – UK-Based Credibility

Alpha Capital Group stands out for one reason most forex prop firms can't claim: they're UK-based and registered with Companies House. For traders who want a prop firm operating under British jurisdiction, that's a meaningful differentiator.

They've built a solid reputation in the UK trading community. The firm positions itself as more "institutional" than most prop firms—less flashy marketing, more focus on professional trading standards.

Pricing starts at £39 for their smallest account. That's comparable to FundingPips once you factor in currency conversion. The evaluation structure is clean—hit the profit target, stay within drawdown, get funded.

My take: Alpha Capital is the firm I'd recommend to UK traders who specifically want a British-based operation. The GBP pricing avoids conversion fees. The UK registration adds a layer of accountability. But the 80% profit split and smaller scaling options make it less attractive if you're purely optimizing for income. I'd still pick FundingPips for the higher profit potential—but I understand why some UK traders prefer Alpha Capital.

Best for: UK traders who prioritize domestic jurisdiction and professional standards over maximum profit split.

5. The5ers – Scaling-Focused Growth

The5ers takes a different approach than most firms on this list. They're heavily focused on scaling—their growth program lets funded traders increase account size over time based on consistent performance.

The firm has been around since 2016, which gives them one of the longer track records after FTMO. Israeli-based, well-funded, and they've built genuine infrastructure for long-term traders rather than evaluation-churners.

Their scaling plan is the main draw. Start with a smaller funded account and grow it through consistent profits. It's a slower path to large capital than buying a $100K eval outright, but it rewards traders who can compound returns over months.

My take: The5ers is for the patient trader. If your strategy is about consistent 2-3% monthly returns rather than aggressive profit targeting, their scaling model rewards you. The path to 100% profit split exists but takes time. For traders who want faster access to capital and higher starting sizes, FundingPips is more efficient.

Best for: Long-term thinkers who value scaling programs and have a compounding mindset.

6. Surge Trader – Simple Audition Model

Surge Trader keeps it dead simple. One evaluation—they call it an "Audition"—and you're funded. No phase 1, phase 2 complexity. Hit the target, manage the drawdown, get your account.

The simplicity is the product. Some traders hate multi-step evaluations because they feel like they're jumping through hoops. Surge Trader removes that frustration entirely.

Entry starts at $49 for their smallest account, which is slightly higher than FundingPips' floor. But the one-and-done evaluation appeals to traders who just want to prove themselves once and start earning.

My take: Surge Trader is a solid niche option. The simplicity is genuine—less mental overhead during evaluation. But the 90% profit split cap and smaller firm size compared to FundingPips or FTMO make it a secondary choice for most traders. Good for your first prop firm experience if you want zero evaluation confusion.

Best for: Traders who want the simplest possible path from evaluation to funded.

How to Choose the Right Alternative

The "best" alternative depends entirely on what's driving you away from—or beyond—FundingPips. Here's my decision framework:

Should You Switch or Diversify?

Honestly? I'd diversify rather than switch. Running accounts across multiple firms protects you from any single firm changing rules, having payout delays, or—worst case—shutting down. It happens in this industry. Having eggs in multiple baskets isn't paranoia, it's experience.

I run FundingPips as my primary forex prop firm, futures accounts at firms like Lucid Trading and Bulenox, and I've tested most of the alternatives on this list. The traders I know who earn the most from prop trading? They're funded at 3-5 firms simultaneously.

If FundingPips works for you, keep using it. Add one or two alternatives based on what gaps you're trying to fill. If you need cTrader, add FTMO. If you want UK-based jurisdiction, add Alpha Capital. If you want to test a completely different scaling model, try The5ers.

Don't switch just to switch. Switch—or diversify—with purpose.

FAQ: FundingPips Alternatives

What's the best overall alternative to FundingPips?

FTMO for maximum trust and platform variety, or FundedNext for the closest feature-to-price match. It depends on whether you prioritize reputation (FTMO) or value (FundedNext).

Which FundingPips alternative has the highest profit split?

The5ers and FundingPips both offer paths to 100% profit split. Among alternatives only, The5ers matches FundingPips' maximum. Most others cap at 80-95%.

Is FTMO better than FundingPips?

Different strengths. FTMO has a longer track record, more platform options, and a free trial. FundingPips has lower entry costs, 1-Step evaluations, and higher profit split potential. Neither is objectively "better"—it depends on your priorities.

Which alternative is cheapest to start with?

FundedNext and FundingPips both start at around $32 for $5K accounts. E8 Markets starts at $38. FTMO is the most expensive entry at €155.

Can I trade with FundingPips and another firm at the same time?

Yes. There's no exclusivity requirement. Many experienced traders—myself included—run funded accounts across multiple firms simultaneously.

Which alternative is best for UK traders?

Alpha Capital Group is UK-based with GBP pricing. FTMO and FundedNext also have strong UK trader communities. All firms on this list accept UK traders.

Which FundingPips alternative offers MT4?

FTMO (MT4, MT5, cTrader) and FundedNext (MT4, MT5). FundingPips, E8 Markets, Alpha Capital, and The5ers are MT5 only.

Do any alternatives offer a free trial?

FTMO offers a free trial account to test their platform and rules before purchasing an evaluation. Most other firms don't offer free trials.

Which alternative has the fastest payouts?

FundingPips and E8 Markets typically process within 24-48 hours. FundedNext ranges from 24-72 hours. FTMO and Alpha Capital tend to be 1-5 business days.

Should I switch from FundingPips or add a second firm?

Add a second firm rather than switching, unless you have a specific dealbreaker. Diversifying across firms is smart risk management. Keep FundingPips as your primary and add an alternative that fills a gap.

Are there any prop firms I should avoid as alternatives?

Avoid firms with no verifiable payout history, extremely aggressive marketing with "guaranteed" returns, or firms that have recently changed ownership. Stick to established names with Trustpilot presence and community verification.

Which alternative is best for beginners?

FTMO's free trial lets you test without risk. For paid evaluations, FundingPips' $5K account at $32 is the lowest-cost way to start. Surge Trader's simple one-step audition removes evaluation complexity.

‍