Best Instruments to Trade on Alpha Futures (NQ vs ES Margins)

Alpha Futures gives you access to the full CME Group product suite—equity indices, metals, energy, currencies, and interest rates. But having access to everything doesn't mean you should trade everything. Most funded traders stick to a handful of instruments, and for good reason. The contract you choose shapes your entire trading experience: how much you can risk per trade, how fast you hit targets, and how likely you are to breach drawdown limits.

I've traded most of these instruments across various prop accounts. Here's what actually matters when picking your contracts at Alpha Futures.

Strategy disclaimer: The approach here is what I've used personally across multiple Alpha Futures accounts in both evaluation and funded phases. Your results depend on execution, risk management, and how well this aligns with your trading style.

For the complete strategy framework I use on Alpha Futures—including DLG-aware position sizing, consistency rule management across Standard and Advanced plans, VWAP-based entries on NQ, and daily target systems built around the 40% consistency cap—check out my comprehensive Alpha Futures strategy guide. It covers evaluation tactics through funded payout scaling, all based on real account experience. For the absolute latest, check Alpha Futures' website.

The Big Decision: Equity Indices

Let's start with what 90% of futures prop traders gravitate toward—equity index futures. These dominate for a reason: deep liquidity, tight spreads, and predictable volatility patterns tied to market sessions.

NQ (E-mini Nasdaq 100) vs ES (E-mini S&P 500)

This is the debate. Both are liquid, both move during U.S. market hours, and both have micro versions. But they behave very differently.

NQ moves more. The Nasdaq 100 is tech-heavy—NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta. When tech moves, NQ really moves. Average daily range tends to run 150-250 points on normal days, sometimes 300+ during volatility spikes. At $20 per point, that's $3,000-5,000+ of daily movement per contract.

ES moves less but more consistently. The S&P 500 is broader, more diversified. Average daily range runs 40-80 points typically. At $50 per point, that's $2,000-4,000 of daily movement per contract. The moves feel smoother, less prone to sudden 50-point whipsaws.

Which One Should You Trade?

There's no universal answer, but here's how I think about it:

Trade NQ if:

• You're comfortable with faster price action and occasional whipsaws
• Your strategy benefits from larger point moves (trend following, momentum)
• You can handle the psychological pressure of watching positions swing $500+ quickly
• Tech sector news and earnings don't catch you off guard

Trade ES if:

• You prefer smoother, more "readable" price action
• Your strategy works with tighter ranges (scalping, mean reversion)
• You want less single-stock concentration risk
• You're newer to futures and want slightly more forgiving movements

I've found NQ rewards patience and conviction—you need to hold through noise to catch the moves. ES rewards precision—tighter entries, smaller targets, higher frequency. Neither is objectively better. They're different games.

Micro Contracts: The Smart Money Move

Here's something I wish someone had told me earlier: micros aren't just for small accounts.

MNQ (Micro Nasdaq) and MES (Micro S&P) are 1/10th the size of their E-mini counterparts. Same markets, same movements, just smaller dollar impact per contract.

Why Micros Make Sense for Prop Trading

The math gets interesting when you realize Alpha Futures counts 10 micros as 1 E-mini for contract limits. A 50K account allows 5 E-mini contracts—or 50 micro contracts. Same exposure ceiling, but dramatically different flexibility.

Consider this scenario on a 50K account with $2,000 trailing drawdown:

Using 2 NQ contracts: Each 10-point move against you costs $400. A 50-point whipsaw (happens regularly) costs $1,000—half your drawdown buffer gone on market noise.

Using 15 MNQ contracts: Same notional exposure as 1.5 NQ contracts, but you can scale in and out. Start with 5 MNQ, add 5 more on confirmation, add 5 more as the move develops. If it reverses after your first entry, you've only got 5 MNQ on—a 50-point move costs $500 instead of $1,000.

This isn't about being scared of size. It's about giving yourself options. I've passed more evaluations using micros to build positions than by going full size immediately.

Beyond Equity Indices: Other Instruments

Alpha Futures offers the full CME suite. Here's what else is worth considering—and what probably isn't.

Gold (GC and MGC)

Gold futures move on their own rhythm. Dollar strength, inflation expectations, geopolitical events, and central bank buying all influence price. The correlation with equity indices exists but isn't tight—gold sometimes rallies when stocks dump, sometimes dumps alongside them.

GC (full gold): 100 troy ounces, ~$10 per tick. At current prices around $2,900/oz, one contract represents roughly $290,000 in notional value. The daily range can run $20-40 easily, meaning $2,000-4,000 of movement per contract.

MGC (micro gold): 10 troy ounces, ~$1 per tick. Much more manageable for prop accounts.

I trade gold occasionally, usually when equity indices are choppy and gold is showing cleaner technical structure. The warning: gold can gap and spike hard on unexpected news. If you're not familiar with what moves gold, stick to equity indices until you've done the homework.

Crude Oil (CL and MCL)

Oil is a different animal entirely. OPEC decisions, inventory reports, geopolitical tensions, weather events—the list of catalysts is long.

CL (full crude): 1,000 barrels, $10 per tick. Extremely volatile. A $2 move (common) costs $2,000 per contract.

MCL (micro crude): 100 barrels, $1 per tick. More reasonable for prop accounts.

My honest take: I avoid oil on prop accounts. The volatility is exciting but unpredictable. Inventory reports drop at 10:30 AM ET and can swing price $1-2 instantly. Unless you're specifically an energy trader with edge in this market, the risk-reward doesn't make sense for evaluation or qualified accounts where you're managing fixed drawdown limits.

Other Products

Alpha Futures also offers:

• RTY/M2K (Russell 2000): Small-cap exposure. More volatile than ES, less liquid than NQ. Niche appeal.
• YM/MYM (Dow): 30 blue-chip stocks. Lower volatility than NQ, similar to ES. Some traders prefer the "feel" of Dow movements.
• Currency futures (6E, 6J, etc.): Euro, Yen, and others. 24-hour markets with different session characteristics. Specialized knowledge required.
• Interest rate futures (ZB, ZN): Treasury bonds and notes. Different trading style entirely—much lower volatility, larger contract sizes.
• MBT and MET (Bitcoin and Ether micros): Available but treated as full contracts for position limits due to volatility. Essentially, 5 MBT counts as 5 contracts against your 5-contract limit on a 50K account. Proceed with extreme caution.

Cost Considerations

Alpha Futures charges no commissions—just regulatory fees that the CME requires. These fees are standardized and honestly pretty minimal:

• NQ: ~$2.80 round trip
• MNQ: ~$0.74 round trip
• ES: ~$2.50 round trip
• MES: ~$0.62 round trip
• GC: ~$3.00 round trip
• CL: ~$2.80 round trip

At these levels, fees shouldn't drive your instrument selection. A $2.80 cost on NQ is meaningless when you're targeting $200+ per trade. Focus on which instrument matches your strategy, not which saves you $0.30 per round trip.

Matching Instruments to Account Size

Your account size should influence—but not dictate—which instruments you trade. Here's how I think about it:

50K Account (5 contracts / 50 micros max)

The $2,000 drawdown (Standard) means every dollar matters. I'd lean toward micros for flexibility:

• Primary: 20-30 MNQ or MES, scaling in/out
• Alternative: 1-2 NQ or ES with tight risk management
• Avoid: Full GC or CL—one bad trade can end your account

100K Account (10 contracts / 100 micros max)

More breathing room with $4,000 drawdown (Standard). You can reasonably trade E-minis:

• Primary: 2-4 NQ or ES, or 40-60 micros for scaling
• Alternative: Mix of NQ/ES and MNQ/MES depending on conviction
• Consider: MGC if you have gold experience

150K Account (15 contracts / 150 micros max)

With $6,000 drawdown (Standard), you're playing with real size:

• Primary: 4-8 NQ or ES comfortably, or mix full-size and micros
• Expanded options: Gold and other products become viable with proper sizing
• Advantage: Can diversify across instruments without crippling position size

The Hedging Rule You Can't Ignore

One critical Alpha Futures rule affects instrument selection: no hedging across accounts or within accounts.

This means you can't go long NQ on one account and short NQ on another. But it also means you can't go long NQ and short MNQ on the same account—Alpha explicitly calls this out as prohibited.

Why does this matter? Some traders like to "hedge" positions by taking opposite sides in correlated instruments (long NQ, short ES for relative value). Alpha's rules don't explicitly prohibit this, but the spirit of the anti-hedging rule suggests caution. Stick to directional trading unless you've confirmed your specific strategy is permitted.

Practical Selection Framework

After all this analysis, here's how I'd actually approach instrument selection at Alpha Futures:

If you're new to futures prop trading: Start with MNQ or MES. Learn how the platform works, how drawdown affects you psychologically, and how your strategy performs in the prop environment. The smaller tick values forgive mistakes.

If you have futures experience: Trade what you know. If you've been trading NQ successfully in personal accounts, trade NQ at Alpha Futures. Don't switch instruments just because you read somewhere that ES is "easier."

If you're diversifying: Pick one primary instrument (NQ or ES) and get consistent with it. Add secondary instruments only after you've proven profitability with your primary.

If you're struggling: Often the problem isn't the instrument—it's the strategy or psychology. Switching from NQ to ES won't fix overtrading or poor risk management. But if you genuinely find NQ's volatility overwhelming, MNQ or ES might be worth exploring.

Final Thoughts

Alpha Futures doesn't restrict which CME instruments you can trade—the full suite is available. But just because you can trade something doesn't mean you should.

For most traders, the choice comes down to NQ, ES, or their micro versions. Both are liquid, well-regulated markets with predictable session-based volatility. NQ moves more and attracts momentum traders. ES moves smoother and attracts precision traders. Micros give you flexibility regardless of which underlying you prefer.

The "best" instrument is the one that matches your trading style, fits your account's risk parameters, and doesn't keep you up at night. For me, that's usually MNQ with occasional forays into full NQ when I have conviction. For you, it might be something completely different.

Pick one. Get good at it. Then worry about diversifying.

‍